 . New Earth
 


     ,             ?   ,    ,   ?   .Where can we find Israel for the Russians, the New World for those who want to build a life away from intolerable state laws and unintelligible regulations? How to develop morals, open communication with God, necessary for this? Lets try to find the answer





 

New Earth



 



 ,2018



ISBN978-5-4493-2454-2

     Ridero







  ( )


,      ,        .

       .      .     ,   .

      ,    .       .

    ,  ⠖ , ,       .

Ƞ    

     ,  (, ,  ,  蠖 )   

, , ,   ,        ,  ,      ,   , ,   ,     ?

  .     ,   , , , ,       ,    .     .

    , ,  .      ,   ,     , ,  .

, ,       ,     .      .       ,   ,  .

      ,       , ,    ,    .  ,  ,    .

  .  ,     頖  .         .   - ,    . ,        ,           .

  ?   ,     ,     ,     .  ,  , ,    .  ?     . Ӡ   ,      (  ),    ,    .  ,  ,   : ,    ,    .  堖 ,     .

      .  ,   ,  .    ,  ,      , .     ,   - .

      .     .         ࠫ .     . , , ,       .  ,    ,  ,       .

 ,    .       .   , - , ,       ,        . , ,   ,   .

 ,      ,  ,     , , , ,  .  ,     ,  .

,          ,     ().

         

, , ,   .  ,         .        ,     ,    .

      .    .    ,    ,       .

,  ,     ,   ,  ,    (     ) .      ( ),     .        .      .      ,  , , , , , .  ,    .

,  ,   .

 ,       ,  .  ,     ,      . , ,  ,     ,   , .    ,  ,     (     ).

,  ,   .      ,    .

     ,       .    ,  , ,  .

 , ,   ,   ?  , , , ,    ? , .       .   , 堖    ,    ,     --      .

 ,    ,   ?  ? ?    , . 蠖     .   , 75% ,   (  1990.)  ,  , , .     ,  蠖   .   :       ,      ,  ,  .  ,   ,  , .          ,       ,    . ,       .

  17   ,    ,   .      16151645.,      .         , , , ,    .

     ,   , 

Ƞ       ,    ,        ,   , ?    . ?  ,    ? ?  -? ,  ,       ,  , , ,  . .  , ,   ,  , , , , , ,  .   ,   , , , .. ,    , , ,    ࠖ , ,  .   ,   .        (  ), ,   , 堖  .

 ,  , ,         ,  ,  .  ,  ,    ,  ,          . ,      . ,  (  ) ,        .

      . , ,  .  .         ,     .         .     蠖   , , , .        .

       頖 , ,    .       .       .  ,  ,  蠖 , , - .   ,    ,        ,  (   )  .

       . -   -     ,  ,     , ..,  ⠖  , ,  ,    ,  ( ),   ,  ,     ,    . Ѡ     -.    ,        (,   ,     ),    .           ,   , . ,   , 95%    .        ,   ,      . ,    ,  .

        .          ,   ,       .       ,   ,  ()  ,   .    ,     .

      , ,     ,  ,  . ,    ,      .

           (),   .        ,       , .

 , ,    ,   (, , , ) ,  ,  .   ,       ,  ,   ,  .        80%     .                .

     ,   ,    .

, ,  ,  ,     .

,  ,       ,  ,    ? ,    ?!           ,  ?    .

 ,      ,   .  ,   ⠖  ()      . ,  ,    , ,  , ,  . , , , ,      ,   .

.      , ,  ,  ,  ,  ?      ?   !

,      , ,      .       .     ?.

 ,     .   ?  ? ? , , ,      ?        ?!

Ѡ       .    , , .     ,  ,   (  ). ,      , ,   ,    . , ,    頖 . Ƞ  .             ,     ,   ,   .   ,           - ,   .

  ,     .        ,   (,   ,   ),   ,   ,     ? Ƞ,   ,    ?

 , , ,  .         ,  ,  . ,  ,        ,   ,   ,   ( 頖  ),   .     .  ,    ,     . ,    ,         .

, ,      , , ,     .      ,       ,     .

 ,   .

,  ,            .    ,  .        ( ,  ).  ,  ,   ,   .  , ,       ,   , ..   , ,  ,  ,   

  .   ,   ,    ,  .        ,  ,  ,  ,   .    (  )    , , ,   ?  ,   .  ?        ?  , , ,  ?      , ,  .  ,    ,      -   .   ,       젖    頖   .

. .   . ,  , .

   ,       ,         .    .       . , ,  ,  .   (  )  .  ,   ,   ,    ,   .     ?     , .      , ,  .    ,  ,     ,   ,           .

Ƞ     , ,  , .     - ,  ,   ..,    ,         .

   ,  :    . Ƞ,   ,   , - ,      . ,        ,  ,   .     ,    . , ,   ,        ,    ,  ,     .    ,   ,         . Ƞ ,  ,   - .         ,  ,   ,   .   ,    ? ,         , , ,  ,   . ,  ,  -  ,       . -   .     ,      .   .

Ƞ .

Ƞ .

Ƞ,      ,    ,   . Ƞ      , ,   , ,       . , .., , , ,  ,   . ,      .  , 75%   (  )   . ,     ,         .

   .      ,   ,     .   蠖 .     (      )   ,   , , , ,  .

   ?  , ,   ,  ,  , , .  , ,  ,   , , , , ..   ,     .    ,   ,    ,   .     ,        ,         . ,   ,   , ,    ,  ,    . ,  ,  ,         .     ,    .

    .      - ?     ,      .     ,    . ,   .  , , .     ,     .         (  ), ,    .

     . ࠖ  .      .   , ,   .    ,  , ,   ,     . , ,   .    () ,    () , , ,     . ,     . , ,    . ,   . ,    ,  ,    .

   (  )      . ,  ,   .   .     ( , ) ?      ,      ?   ,  ? , . ,  ,     ,    ,    .        . , , ,     ,   ,  .     , ,  (    )    . , ,      젖    , ,  .  蠖  ,  , .

     . ,   .  , .    ,  蠖       .    ,  , , ,  ,  ,    ,  , ,   .   ,  ,     頖       . Ѡ      ,    .    .      .     ( ).       ,       . Ѡ    .  ,         ,  ,  .   22  . ,  -,    -  ,        ?    .

Ƞ ,      .

  ?

   ,   .

 ,    ,  ,   ,   .  ,  , , ,     .

   ,  ,  .

1.         (, ,    ..)  .    (,   )       .   , , , ,   .          ,     ( ),       PaxRomana.  ,       ( ,    ). Ӡ ,     .    . ,  - -.  ,       .         . ,         ,  .

       .     ,        ,  , 堖  . , ,  ,  ,     .    .

   ,      .  20    ,  ( ), .. ,    ,      ,    .    .

  -- .   .          ,  .    :   , ,       .  .

,   ,    蠖 .

2.   .     .      (  ,    ),  , ,   .       .  - ,   ,  . 䠖    .

  ,   ,    .

     ,  .   , ,   . ,       ,     , ,     .

3. ,    .   ,     .  ,       , ,    ,      ,    .

     ( ), ,  .    .       .

    . ,    ,      ,   .  ,       . ,   ,  , ,  ,   .

4.    - . 20    ,  .        .     (     ).    ,   ,   ,   -  .        . ,  ,  ,      , (     )   ,   .

6.   ,  -, ..    .     ,   .   , ,         - ,     .        -   頖   - ,   .   , ,     ,    .     .     , , , .     .    ,        ,     .  ,  ,            ,    黠   ,  .    .      ,   ,    ,    蠖  .

7.      蠖       .    ,   ,     , ,   ,     .  .       . ,     ࠖ  ,  ,     .            , ,    .    , ࠖ ࠖ           .

,      -  .     .        , , ,   ,       .        ,  , ,  .  ,  ,           ,    .     ,    ,     ,   , ..       , -,       , ,         .

 ,   -  ?  , . ,    ,     , ,  ,  ,  . ,    ,  (  ,  )      . ,        200300 ,    (),     .  , .

   .    . ,      .

 ,   -  ,  , .  ,    ?  ,   .         ,   젖   , ,    .

8.     -   .    ()      .      .       .

     .   , ,   ꠫ .     .   , , ,     ,  ,  ,    ,    .

 ,      (),       . ,  ,    ,     .       ࠫ 蠫.        .  ,  ,   , - ,    .    (  ,    ,  )        .

,         .

9.          .             .       4,5.  (7  ).  ,       ().  ,  ,    ,  ,      ? ,        ?   ? ,  ? , , , , , , , , ?

            ( )  ,    .      ,  ,  ,  , ,       .  ,   ,      .     ,   . 蠖   .      , ,  ,    ,         .

    ,   - .       .   ,        .    ,  ,    .

   .

       , ,   .  . ,     ࠖ  . ,      ,  , ,   ,  , , ,      ,  , ,  ,   ,      . ,   .

10.     .  㠖    ( ,  )  .  .    .      .  ,   .    ,   . ,   (   )    ,   .     , ., ..

11.  蠖   10.    .    .  ,       ,          堖 .

12.      ,       ,     .  堖  , ,  ,     .  , , ,   .

. .    .   .  ,   . . ࠖ  ,   , ,  , .., .    , .  ,   .  ,  . 堖  , ,  .

   堖   1:1.       .    ,    .       . 堖   .    ,      ,   .

  ,    .     .   ,  ,    ,    .

   ,        ,     1,2.  ,      ,  .   (   ,   ).    ,    .     . , , -0, ,      ,     蠖  .






1.       .      . 2.     .       젖     . 3, 4.    ,    ( ).       



13.          , , . ,      ,     ,  .  ,  ,   ,          .

14.  .    ,  ,       (, ,  ,  ),  ࠖ   , .     . ,     .  ,      .

    ( ),      .        , , , ..

 ,     (   )     (  ),  .

15.     , , ,    ,  ,  , .     ,  ,    .    ,   ,  ,  , ,     .  젖   : .

16.      . ,       (     )     .       ,    ,      (,  ,         ).    ,   ,  .   , ,  , ,   , ,   .       .     ,    ,    .

  ()    .  , ,    (, л)  -    ,  .        , ,     (, , ,  , - ).

,  ,  - ,        ,  ,    , ,  ,  ,     .

17.   ,  , .   ,  (   )     .     ,     ( , . , . , . , . , . ).    ,    (.., ),   ,  ,  ,    , .

18.    (, , ,   )   (- , ) .   , , .      7  .   :         265  .



Ƞ



 ,    ,     .   ,    ,    ,    .  ,         ,   젖         .      ,   ,   .     1015%  . ,  ,    ,  ,     .  ,  ,     ,  ,      .

,   , -  ,    ,     .        ,      ,   ,    .     ,   蠖             ,        .

  ,        .

     . ,     ,      ,      .

   , ,    ,  , ,     ,   .     , ,    .

,   -   . ,      蠖  . ,    렖  .       . .

     ,   堖         ,    .

..       ,     (  ,    ) ,         .

             ,          .

Ƞ,  堖  ꠫ ,       ,  . ,   .          . Ƞ ,  ,      .

 ,  ,    ,    ,     . ,       , , ,  .






 ,   Silverstein Properties



       -   -.  ,      (),      ,    , ..          ,  ,     ,    .

23 2001          - .  ,   . 11     14 .      ( 젖  ) 3, 6. .     ,   7,2 ,       8. ( , , 47-  -7,         ).          (    12. ).      ,   ,   . ,      (   ),       ,              .

 ,        .      ,  ,  .  - ,  ,       ,       (   ,     3 ).      .     .

 ,       .

  , ,  , ,   .

       ,         . ,  ,       ,            .

   .

,   11 2001   . , 8 1967     ,    (  )    .  34.  ,       蠖 ,      .     ,       (   )     .

 ,    . Ƞ, ,  ,        ,     ,     ,   .   ,    ,   , (,    ,   ),      .

 ,  ,       ,     ?   , ,    , ,    ?  , ,  . ,     ,      .

 ,  ࠖ ( -  ) ,    .     , -  .

Ƞ .

  ,   ,         . ,  ,    ,        . ,    ,     ,  ,    ,      .

    .




SOLUTION OFCONSCIOUSNESS (INSTEAD OFTHE PREFACE)


Ihope that inthe solution ofconsciousness presented tothe good reader, sooner or later wonderful crystals ofthe New Reality will be formed.



Inthe fifteenth century, the most active Europeans emigrated toAmerica. Two large continents are free for settlement. At about the same time, the Middle Ages, sometimes called the Dark Ages,end.

Inphysical isolation from the old forms ofsocial life, people are building anew civilization. Europe has the opportunity tolook at itself from the outside.

Anew country is being built byrepresentatives ofsecret, united societies Illuminats, Masons, who fully imagine ways ofeffective organization ofpeople.

And we need your own America

Together with people trained within acertain productive organization, people (NKVD, KGB, and other terrorist communities, their successors are not counted) one couldtry

Where, friends, we are looking for acontinent, at least apiece ofterritory for Russians Israel for Russians, the Holy Land, inwhich one can hide from oak laws and legislators tobuild life, as we need, and not as it pleases another Russian monarch?

Along-standing Russian dream Here the inhabitants ofvillages and towns talked, where somewhere inthe North, inthe Ocean, inSiberia, or beyond the Urals there is such awonderful Belovodie inhabited bythe right people. Everyone lives there intruth.

Therefore, our people stretched toSiberia, and further, tothe East and North. Not so much for the skins ofvarious forest animals, but just toget the opportunity tocreate their own, free, wonderful life.

However, the same, the beaten path without any physical break, they were followed byservants ofstate officials. They established state orders on new lands. Everything again and again was done at the will and whim ofthe supreme ruler remote, sitting behind the stone walls.

Due toreligious principles and inherent gentleness ofcharacter, the Russians never cleared the occupied land oflocal residents, as did the Anglo-Saxons, and toalesser extent the Spaniards. There was assimilation, the adoption ofnative, at times even barbaric customs.

The Russians reached Alaska. Bering Strait, the physical division ofland byawater obstacle this is important. These vast new territories began totake shape ofan independent state. There was not any police here, everything was built on effective self-government. Perhaps, inaddition tothe desire tofill the unchecked currency with the pockets ofthe Tsars relatives, the monarchical elite simply did not want togive the enslaved people such awonderful social mirror.

What will be the new Russia? All byitself, from one initiative ofthe current government tothe next, goes tothe next territorial squeeze ofthe country, the emergence ofnew states inits place. Some people think that, here, friends, you should not even think about it. But how is it? Lets remember the catastrophe at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. Firefighters did not have special suits, no insulating breathing apparatus (only gas masks), no remotely controlled equipment, no distinct action plan. Heads ofthe station, and all the others, up tothe ministers, dismissed: Oh, this can not be because it can not be ever. As aresult victims, which could not be so many.

First, disobedience oflocal authorities tothe Center may manifest itself. Yet they, how much then, but closer tothe people. There are no FSO fighters, unimaginable privileges, insane arrogance and open toany excavations, the state budget. On the ground people are used tomaking money, and not just totake them inany fund.

Tobegin with, the mayors offices will stop portraits ofthe president inthe offices. Establish rigid boundaries between regions. Protection ofgoods produced intheir own territory is already being carried out insome way. Then everything will be just tougher. Although not the fact that it is so linear.

Maybe some regions are consolidated.

First ofall, some ofMoscows resolutions will be canceled, such as checking anything on any occasion, fines, levies, excises.

Local authorities will set restrictions for foreign people entering the territory ofthe region.

The overlapping ofautomobile and railway highways starts. But, its only inextreme cases. Only when the critical number ofpeople do not remain instock even pasta. There are still at least notorious chicken thighs on Sundays, and how many grammes offlour products, mass performances should not be expected.

Most likely it will not be the outskirts. It is their central regions. The center will be thrown at the Cossacks, as well as bythe fighters ofthe Internal Troops, who are now thought ofwith arather elegant name rogvardeytsy.

But, infact, power structures depend on the working people, which they guard, inmuch the same way as they guard the chosen herd ofdeer (quite ready todo without such counselors) the indigenous inhabitants ofthe Polar region, the Chukchi. If we stop working with you (the option is todie), their usual high level will go down. Some oil money for feeding this crowd is not enough. The same can be said about the infantrymen ofthe current President. While the flow ofmoney earned inthe Tula, Krasnoyarsk, Voronezh, Kaluga, Kemerovo, and other regions is flowing into the well-known national republics, they will certainly be loyal tothe Center.

And, at first, actively helphim.

Let us recall, however, from what ahundred years ago the real, October Revolution began. General Kornilov, inorder totake control ofPetrograd, sends tothe northern capital ofthe Caucasian Native Corps. The workers, having learned that, here, they are being pacified bythe Dagestanis and Chechens, smashing military depots, and armed. The Wild Division stopped no, not the order ofthe Commander-in-Chief, but the order ofone ofthe influential elders (who decided that the mountaineers had nothing todo inPetrograd).

The workers, having received their rifles, did not stop there. Less than six months later, there was alarge-scale, great and terrible October revolution.

If the current leaders had studied the history better, they would not have counted so much on helping the South. Everything is repeated inthe same form as before, but still, quite similar.

Will it be possible, even now, namely, the starving workers employees, toget arms intheir hands? So you, for example, the reader, do you know where the nearest warehouse is located? Probably not. Even inconventional military units, now you will not find it. Fearful ofthe state ofemergency with weapons, more precisely the unpleasant possibility oflosing high-paid, quiet work with avariety ofbenefits, the current commanders simply removed machine guns-cartridges from weapons rooms inthe unknown where the hangars are located.

Inaddition, even if there was aweapon, what todo with it? Tobeat cars? Meaning? The Russian economy is not that weak, but bleached. Money the blood ofthe economy flows toan unknown destination. Tobe precise, 75% ofthe budget, through the Bank ofRussia (private ownership since 1990) sail into nowhere, friends, unknown tous, the beneficiaries. More details about all this, with figures and facts inthe following parts ofthe text. One can say firmly: people are afraid ofacatastrophically rapid fall inthe standard ofliving, which will necessarily come when mass, especially armed, demonstrations are launched. The meaning is, if there was an agreement, aplan ofaction, an Organization. So far, the Russians have avoided each others presence as much as possible, have remained unfamiliar with their neighbors for years astaircase, they rarely see their relatives. Unity, communication schemes are often not even on the kinship level.

Europe ofthe early 17th century was bogged down inaseries ofdevastating, no longer ritualistic knightly, vast civil wars. The catalyst for the resettlement was the Thirty Years War of16151645, which claimed half ofthe population insome regions ofEurope. The only way out for many inthe Old World was todump from England, Germany, France, Holland, Spain into the alluring overseas territories.

Between the metropolis and new people is now, hindering the blows ofthe Old, the Ocean

And again we have the same question where tofind Russian America, Israel for Russians Belovodie, which can only be accessed through awatery or sandy desert, free from oppression? We will not get rid ofcommon phrases. Inthe north? Maybe its the New Earth archipelago? Taimyr? The land ofFranz Josef? Alas, everywhere there, between the ruins ofthe Gulag are already ponatykany military bases, protected areas, submachine gunners, dogs, and then. Its boring. Everywhere they will get it, they say, you have topay afine, give business, not live, and live, be checked, controlled, served, curved and obeyed. Its the same inthe East, somewhere inSiberia, inKamchatka, inthe South, inthe West Wherever fields, forests, vacant lots, abandoned villages and unoccupied monotowns are now stretching, everywhere, it turns out, there are masters. It only seems that they are not. Start something here todo they will appear (so untidy and unpleasant), and they will say that infact, everything is their property.

As you know, the American Australian, New Zealand, other Anglo-Saxon colonists declared the lands Terra Nulius, that is tosay, tied territories, they mastered. After that, according toGomstead, these large pieces ofland, marked bysettlers, were given tothem inperpetual possession at the end ofthe five-year period ofacompletely sparing lease. Indians, other people the government could not claim them. Toredeem, lure (during the Great Depression) yes, but no longer take it because we so suddenly wanted already.

Sometimes the land was bought from the leaders, who are inconsiderable alcoholic intoxication. For the beads, knives, mirror and alcohol. Already forever. After this symbolic act, the Indian tribes could be evicted, like the tenants from the apartment they sold. The White colonists ofNorth America were not interested inIndians as citizens ofanew country. For life aborigines were allocated reservations territories with aspecial status, which are considered, perhaps, not quite America. If necessary, the boundaries ofthese settlements could be revised.

Inthe Russian Empire, the tsar was always happy toacquire territories Siberia, Asia, already quite densely populated. The colonial movement ofthe Russian people was carried out insofar as. The reason for this is the primordial alienation ofpower from the people. The first princes, the ruling elite, according tohistoriography Varangians, aliens, warriors-plunderers ofScandinavia. The most famous Rurikovich, Ivan the Terrible, inconversations with foreigners, sometimes identifies himself with letters only with them sometimes with the Germans, but does not want aRussian (except inthe official title).

The second and last Russian dynasty ceases tobe Russian with Peter the Great. The Tsar emperor communicates only inGerman marries an uneducated Lithuanian or German woman, concludes the first, Russian wife Yevdokia Lopukhin inamonastery, etc. Inessence, the accomplishments ofthe predecessors the kings ofMikhail, Fedor, Alexei the annexation ofUkraine, quite successful wars with Poland, Turkey (Chigirinsky campaigns), regiments ofthe new system, not aweak economy, developing cooperation with countries ofWestern Europe, its chroniclers are artificially obscured. With Peter III Russia ruled the German dynasty Holstein-Gottorp. Having defeated Crimea from the Ottoman Empire, Catherine II inhabits it with those who did not deserve the Russians (for example, retired soldiers, as was practiced inancient Rome), but related ethnic Germans. These people arrange asemblance ofparadise on the peninsula plant luxurious gardens do not pay taxes, enjoy freedom oftrade, movement. Again, unlike the inhabitants ofCentral Russia, 95% ofwhom are now slaves. Inthe same Ancient Rome, slavery was often atest, for forging citizens who could fully appreciate the taste offreedom. Here, with aless sophisticated government, this is notso.

Inside Russia, rulers can not find acouple for aformal marriage. Empress Elizabeth Petrovna secretly crowned with Alexei Razumovsky the son ofthe Dnieper Cossack, but the fruit oftheir love, the notorious Elizaveta ofVladimir perishes inthe casemate ofthe Peter and Paul Fortress. The daughter ofthe secret marriage ofCatherine II and Grigory Potemkin, or their son, Alexei (Bobrinsky) become bastards, courtiers ofthe second echelon. The dynasty is impregnated with foreign blood, and has no inflow ofRussian blood.

InCentral Europe, Russian princesses marry monarchs, princes, counts ofprincipalities and middle-kingdoms, merge with the environment, and Russias interests do not represent. And, it is hardly possible toremember the Russian prince, who became the king ofat least adwarf European monarchy.

Starting with Peter the Great, Russia participates inEuropean wars without the slightest benefit for itself (the people), or even soldiers. The apogee ofthe insane waste ofblood reaches under Alexander the First, fighting with Napoleonic France for the interests ofBritain and the German principalities, outside ofRussia.

Joseph Dzhugashvili, aCaucasian, indifferently meets the news that millions ofRussian (Ukrainian, Kuban, Transcaucasian, Kazakh) farmers, and their children, are dying ofhunger. The main thing for him, and many people inthe near-term circle ofcommunication his own greatness, militaristic aspirations, abstract schemes ofworld governance, and not the voice ofthe people. The native Georgians remain outside the collective farm system incontrast to80% ofRussians have passports and freedom ofmovement. Thanks tothe high purchase prices for agricultural products produced bythe Center, they are the most prosperous group ofthe population ofthe USSR.

Approximately the same applies toanother ethnic group, natives ofRussia once, but almost always hostile toPoland.

Blood, genetics, defining the spirit, the style ofcommunication, preferences axiomatic love is important.

How, perhaps, tobuy from the unfriendly tothe Russian Federation land for Our America, so that we, simple people, pour there? And, how do you define the concept ofRussian?! How much is it generally speaking ethical and acceptable for us todistinguish people according tobiological, hereditary characteristics? This seems very strange.

Nevertheless, aclear division into ones own and anothers exists inmodern, democratic and developed countries. If you, according tothe necessary set ofdocuments ethnic (Volga) German welcome tothe Federal Republic ofGermany. Here, social benefits, if you do not want towork right away, housing, language courses, apension, and so on. But ofcourse, Russian, Kazakh, Evenk, no matter how good they are, nothing like this is proposed.

The Jews. The state organization for repatriation is satisfied with your documents, name, eye color, lip line, nose shape, certificates ofsponsors? Can you pronounce the faith inHebrew? Shalom Aleichem Israel!

Also, throughout the world there are specialized kindergartens, schools, where children are accepted exclusively on this national basis. Other boys and girls are not allowed toenter these institutions. Does the international community regard this as nationalism or Nazism?No.

As you know, inRussia it is considered shameful toallocate Russians. Who is Russian? Acitizen ofRussian Federation? AEurope? Well, and Eskimos, Evenks, Buryats they are not worthy ofaliyah within the Russian Federation? So this will violate the unity ofthe Russian people and interethnic harmony?!

On the one hand, the high inclination ofRussians tointerethnic marriages is good. The composition ofthe people is, as it were, leveled. Something similar is inChina, where genetically, people are homogeneous (and this is not particularly complex). Certainly, although there are special economic zones inthe Middle Kingdom, there are, inprinciple, two seemingly incompatible systems ofnational republics. Just like, and inanother country with astrong economy the US. And Europe is completely homogeneous. The notion ofaEuropean as acitizen ofsocial education from Gibraltar tothe borders ofRussia or Poland is born inthe time ofCaesar, fairly smoothed the national composition ofItaly and Gaul, or Charlemagne, at the beginning ofthe Middle Ages. Many small tribes are forcibly, or under the influence ofserious social institutions, they are deprived oftheir own lands and are pouring into akind ofheterogeneous, but still unified community.

So much has already been written, but we have not approached the main question. Is it necessary todistinguish and strengthen the core ofthe nation Russians interms ofbiological characteristics, style ofbehavior (which, as we have shown, can be productive), or as before, without preference toanyone, tolive inan averaged state with national republics? And yes, where is that territory on which it would be possible tobuild Russian America?

There is an option, here, remember, the community Anastasia. Invented byacertain venerable writer, an intelligent woman preaches life innature, far from civilization, inpatrimonial estates. And, some people, since the late nineties ofthe last century, they are developing abandoned villages, building wooden houses, live without registration, medical care (from all hurts ahot bath), education for children. Now this movement is almost not heard. Some believe that this is akind ofdeception, for buying up land and reselling afterwards. It is more correct, probably, tothink about the rather massive, albeit clumsy impulse ofmany people ofRussia tosome kind ofinternal emigration.

But, you see, its not quite right tolive without decent work, inneo-paganism, apart from the big world and global problems. Such settlements can exist as long as their inhabitants seem too pathetic, weak and impractical for the current government.

Inprinciple, one can think about this.

For example, inautonomous settlements, kibbutzis, Israel, which has been repeatedly mentioned here, effectively produces agricultural and high-tech industrial products. Inthe course oftourism, educational projects. Live inkibbutzi people united byideas ofequality and freedom (first ofall, fiery youth). Practice is not downshifting, return tonature, but adeveloped production scheme, and an equitable distribution ofbenefits. Inaddition, yes, the settlements are inafairly wide framework ofthe laws ofthe country, established religious traditions, etc. There is medical assistance, perhaps the best inthe world, the education system, and much more

You can say so. Inthis country, whether due tothe blood-bearing unity, or still areligious community, people trust each other. Some groups are united ininterest groups occupy apiece ofland, build asettlement surrounded byawall, with atower inthe middle, and whisper about something. Inthe disunited and weak-willed (well think up such aword), Russia will immediately be startled byspecial services, FSB, FSO, who else is there? all different, as the siloviki say. How so? Without us, who is doing something really efficient? Without supervision, supervision, supervision, registration and accounting? It is necessary toput your nose there, frighten, interrogate and disunite. It is very good, if inthe lured, or just near-minded media, there will be some articles about the exposure ofthe sect. Confirm the stupidity ofpeople who decided todo something without coordination with the state apparatus this is for the current rulers just abalm for the soul.

Mistrust. Lack oflove for the people. Here, infact, the woes ofRussia.

We have already said that, tosome extent, Little Love is connected with the fact that Russia has too many adopted children inthe family ofnations. Sometimes even without their consent. Without counting the votes ofmany members ofthe established family. Imagine, inthe family, without notice, conversations, etc., some people (nominally the heads ofthe family) populate the foster child. The novice is whimsical, selects your toys, the most delicious food, attention surreptitiously beats you, and does not bear awell-deserved punishment. Will there be peace and harmony insuch afamily? If you reject the bigotry most likely not. Moreover, your love for brothers, sisters, and even ancestors will depreciate. If you learn that, behold, there is your brother inthe distant lands, who suffers deprivation, and wishes you return, you most likely will not want totake part inhis fate.

And therefore the process ofrepatriation ofRussians from Abroad is slowed down, or, more correctly, does not work. If something unpleasant happens with our compatriot, Russian diplomats, employees oftravel agencies, etc., will most likely show inertia, and will be inclined toblame the very victim ofacombination ofcircumstances inall the misfortunes.

Lets confess again, only honestly: we do not love each other. And because the nation is not defined, is composed ofheterogeneous fragments, and because ofthe multitude, the set ofconstantly constantly hanging household trifles. Look, the taxi driver parked the car inthree meters behind apublic transport stop, sits init, waits for clients for hours. Buses stop three meters from the sidewalk, and the people are getting tothem on the highway. Aman smokes at astop, inacrowd, releasing apuff ofsmoke, as if burping his lungs His head is busy with his own, not aglimpse ofthe fact that, here, someone might not like it. Here the music lover listens tomusic, at such amazing loudness that even through his skull you can hear all around on the bus. And he understands, its all the same, that it is unpleasant for someone. Aman is walking adog He does not care if she urinates inthe elevator, defecates on the sidewalk, twenty times for awalk tomark the territory. What kind ofbags, responsibility topeople children? Here, an unknown compiler ofadvertising throws out images ofparasites, worms, papillomas, fictitious creatures, bared dentures tomillions ofcomputer monitors. You, perhaps, reading some serious text, are forced each time tostumble at aglance at this abomination. Programmer-IT also does not care. He just scratch your nerves, without any benefit and you can not get toit. No feedback.

And there is no love.

And there is no economy.

And those who somehow got into the government, maximum ineight years, cease tolove and cherish Russia. And the state budget becomes just asafe for the elect, those whom the ruler loves, knows with whom he engaged insports or ascended the career ladder. Money, that is, power, good, energy, flows where there is Love. Yes, this intangible substance has the power ofattraction. It has already been said that 75% ofthe Russian budget (according tothe estimates ofan independent American organization) flows into the unknown. But, we know for sure that hundreds ofbillions ofdollars are also invested inUS securities.

Money is not just paper. Inthe US, it can be so, there dollars are printed, and displayed on monitors inunlimited quantities. InRussia, money is earned. Every dollar or euro (inthe EU also hundreds ofbillions ofour money work) is equivalent tothe produced goods, mined and transported metals, minerals, gas, oil, fodder grain.

What does it mean toinvest inpaper? This means, friends, give them tothe owner, that is, if with pathos, the beneficiary, the beneficiary. The top ofthe United States, Britain, these, the hidden holders ofthe Central Bank, the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Rothschilds, etc., can all eat it, with all their appetites can not. And it is not accepted there ingeneral, todraw caviar with aladle, tospend money on elite ladies ofsupport, tomake gold toilet bowls. This money such ahuge amount ofmoney tobe used byjust afew hundred ruling families, it would be necessary tobuild each ofthem according tothe Golden House inthe style ofEmperor Nero. Yes, these are dachas, akilometer and ahalf, with aswimming pool, where there can be yachts, and sliding ceilings, from where flowers come crashing down on the guests. No, our means, that is, the material blessings eventually spread over the people ofEngland, Old and New. This fertile energy is attracted towhere there is trust and love.



Iwill now make an unusual digression. Have you read the book Mummy Troll and the Comet byTuve Janson? Friends nice trolls go tothe observatory tolearn from scientists something important about the comet. Inthe way they are ominous, or simply mysterious signs. And, everywhere, the water goes away. Meleut lakes, streams, canals. The ocean itself turns into amarshy desert, with skeletons ofships and dried up algae dunes. Eventually, trolls and their acquaintances take cover inacave (unstable chance ofsalvation), well, and the comet passes bythe Earth.

Some interesting allegories are felt here. Water is love. Russia is like the Earth before the fall ofacomet. Everywhere invisible lakes, rivers, springs oflove dry up. People huddle together, strive for cities, where, they think, the probability offinding the desired moisture above. But, it seems, this is not quite true. We walk with stone (wooden) faces, do not help each other (materially), we curse, we curse, we expose long lists ofdemands for love. And, very little is obtained here. Wells, boreholes, even hidden pots dry up. Water, love is life. It seems, it is still alot, it is free, but without it everything ends.

Inthis book (and other texts ofthe author) portraits ofsome influential persons ofthe Russian Federation are presented. Here, Elvira Nabiullina, the formal head ofthe Central Bank. Look at this face. Do you see the imprint oflove for the Russian (or, indeed, the Russian) people? This person day and night reflects on how tomake all ofus happy? Does she wake up with the thought oflow-income, orphans and seniors? Probably not. The state, that is, the enforcement machinery inRussia is not the head ofthe family, distributing the blessings inthe beloved family, but the capitalist inthe worst sense ofthe word. This owner day and night thinks only ofhis own profit. Pensioners, children, disabled people, people without their own homes for decades, for him ballast, subject towrite-off. Do not drop this load only because, inprinciple (when there is not even apasta), people can go out into the streets. And, yes, it can affect the reputation ofowners abroad where they have families, real estate, fixed capital. There is no love only acold, like atoad, calculation.

Here, Veronika Skvortsova, Minister ofHealth. It seems tobe agood person. At least it was. But there is no live work with people, feedback and the face imprinted the image ofan accountant who is indifferent tothe objects ofcalculation. Approximately such an expression was available, Im sure, figures who count how much fat, leathers are made, hair can be obtained from people killed inDachau, Buchenwald, and other concentration camps. The bureaucracy ofthe Russian Federation, lure security officials, the beneficiaries ofthe Central Bank require large profits and the performer oftheir evil will obediently fulfills the task. With considerable help from Rosstat, living people turn into obedient, handy numbers for manipulation. Optimization ofmedical institutions is introduced. Cities and villages are deprived ofthousands ofhospitals and polyclinics. Tens ofthousands ofdoctors are declining (even inMoscow). At the same time, the joyful Skvortsova says that thanks toelectronic terminals, queues topolyclinics are disappearing. With electronic figures, you can do everything. The queues do not disappear, they are smeared intime people unwillingly refuse tovisit state polyclinics, go private, or die. Mortality rises by22thousand people ayear. But, the face ofthe medical accountant, confident inhis rightness ofthe zaznayki-excellent pupil, remains the same, as you would know well, how is it still tosay correctly? think up that word yourself.

And so on, throughout the apparatus ofthe Russian Federation and the circle ofpersons close tothe President.

Why does the water leave?

Much has been said about this, but more remains unsaid.

The present government, and, ingeneral, part ofthe people, leads the country, as it was said, toanother territorial squeeze. Its not good, its bad, but, nevertheless, you need alayout for this variant ofevents.

The Soviets are newly formed countries, or the new, even if diminished, Russia.

1. Immediate relocation ofthe Government from the Kremlin toacomplex ofbuildings convenient for interaction with the people (reception rooms, forum, parking places, etc.). Even with Ivan the Third (on the whole, who founded this structure), the Russian state was going somewhere not quite there. His main ideas, alas, are militarization, autocracy, centralization enslavement ofpeople. At the same time, total militarization does not contribute tovictories over the enemy with adevastating score, the formation ofagalaxy ofgreat generals (with rare exceptions) capable oforganizing order inthe occupied territories inthe Pax Romana style. It often turns out that Russia is waging wars inthe interests ofother states (such as the first coalitions against Napoleon). For sure, the Russian people do not enjoy the fruits ofvictories. Centralization is given as sobornost. Sobornost, its something religious-mystical. State apparatus, the leader assigns the meaning ofthe word inits own mercenary purposes. Soborostnost too often means enslavement bythe state apparatus. Well, the state itself inthis context means Ahandful ofambitious, greedy people interested inslavery.

The authorities ofNew Russia do not need torule the country from the residence ofthe kings. Somehow this is intheir minds, as if the thought Im not like everyone else, the great monarch, and the rest are my servants leaks out ofthe walls. Well, you know, such apoison, like phenol from houses with wrong seals. For along time you can not be here.

We release the ancient Kremlin from the government, we give it tomuseums and excursionists from all over the world. The buildings built inthe 20th century are rebuilt into colorful hotels, libraries (branches ofthe RSL), etc. Ingeneral, access tothe territory becomes free, now it is afavorite place for walking, arecreation area and apositive mood. The Kremlin is beginning tobenefit.

Reconstruction of the building of the Cheka-NKVD-FSB in the Lubyanka. A complete demolition is not excluded. This is the only way to get rid of the relapses of seizure of power by the "siloviki" over the country, by all of us. The people need a clear message: the era of mistrust of people, extortion, secret and obvious murders of its best representatives ended. The tumor is removed.

Streets bearing the names ofthe organizers ofterror, the majority ofthe rulers ofthe Bolshevik era, are renamed.

2. General reform ofprisons. Former correctional institutions are subject todemolition. Innew buildings, everything is automated (the minimum number ofsecurity guards, this kind ofservice breaks down the psyche), cameras for one, or, hardly two people. Prisoners communicate with each other through an internal electronic network. No parole, warming ofthe zone from the side, and labor activity. Labor is the privilege ofafree and honest person.

For all that, naturally normal nutrition, providing decent living conditions.

Prisoners should not form new criminal communities, influence the mores ofadolescents. Aman who has transgressed the law, and the condemned, must return tothe Law. The fact that he is deprived ofhis liberty byacourt decision does not mean that he falls into azone oflawlessness, violence, risk tohealth and life itself.

3. All-round, maximum simplification ofthe tax system. It is better not tocollect tax than topush aperson away from his Cause. It is also clear that this money will not go tofeed the army ofsiloviki, officials, or any kind ofstate distributors, but without losses inthe way they go todevelop production, feed children and help their parents.

Tax declarations are written once ayear (as inNorth America), practically, inan arbitrary form. Then the tax is paid. For large enterprises, the system is only alittle more complicated.

Trust is one ofthe names ofLove. And, as we have shown, without it no great country or strong economy is possible. Byand large, inadecent society, people control each other themselves. Aperson who does not contribute, is revealed inconversations, deeds, is deprived oftrust, support and becomes an outcast.

4. Freedom ofdemonstrations without any agreement. Up to20people can take part indemonstrations incities, anywhere. Moreover inprivately equipped places for rallies. These places become cult (like the Old Arbat ofthe early nineties). It is possible totrade paintings, like art objects, food ofown preparation, handicrafts without any permits and inspections. All the checks here are amatter solely for sellers and buyers. So, its crowded, there are TV cameras, where everything happens immediately gets tothe web, and (provided aneat kind and normative vocabulary) you can say anything that comes toyour mind.

6. Reducing the number ofinspections, inspections ofsomething, etc., at least ten times. All must be checked bythe people themselves, the initial interested persons. At present, we recall that any state ofemergency inthe country causes, first ofall, the unhealthy revival ofthe siloviki inspectors. Now, you can not do without us. At the same time, an emergency is always due tothe inertia ofthe people themselves as owners ofany enterprises, and their customers. What additional state control, gospriemki, all new inspectors do not appoint, everything will only get worse. State inspectors act on abstract schemes. They are not interested inthe real state ofaffairs, security, convenience, expediency. Only the execution ofanother unintelligent decision. Even the best ofthem, without the control ofordinary people eventually come tothe conclusion that the main value is money. For example, year after year, for very large sums, measurements ofinsulation resistance ofwires inthe walls ofschools and kindergartens, the speed ofoperation ofautomatic switches are carried out according tothe same scheme, quite formally. This is generally no use toanyone. While real problems that can lead toafire, and which can be eliminated on the spot, for very small living money and remain.

7. We cover the doors for the Caucasus and Central Asia we open wide the gates for Europeans from classical Europe. Exhausted byimmigration from African countries, half-ruined Arab states, white Europeans have long dreamed oftheir America, where, tosome extent, one can openly talk about ones convictions. This is not areservation. Russia inwhat is still quite afree country. Yes, there is acertain freedom ofspeech here and therefore, bythe way, dear friends, you read these heartfelt lines. InEurope, for posing the question ofcrime among immigrants, you can be fined for anon-child amount, planted, or deprived ofprestigious work. InUkraine, for the criticism ofthe war inthe Donbass, ajournalist-blogger-a common citizen, militants ofsemi-legal groups ofnationalists, who act at the domestic level, are most likely tobe killed.

Also, inRussia for white foreigners there is some kind ofreserve ofnovelty. The freshness ofperception is very important toman. Toalarge extent, all this fuss with the refugees from Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq is due tothe fact that people want todo something important. It is hardly possible tocall such an important trip tothe store, tobored work, tothe theater, or tothe exhibition. Saving people, manifesting themselves, straining all mental and physical strengths is very important for the development ofaperson, some kind ofhis spiritual tone. This is used bysome political circles, such as inthe US perhaps they are helping financially volunteers, equipping rescue vessels, etc. The united Europe should not become too strong But, inthe first place, initself its all not so really bad, secondly, such assistance would be useless without the initial interest ofordinary Europeans.

Do you think they want something bad for Russia? Isuppose not. And, if they open the gates, they could help inthe fight against corruption, on the household, and the upper levels, with the development ofthe economy, the conduct ofbusiness. Ido not think that from the flow ofwhite migrants, tourists (with unlimited extension ofthe visa, with awork permit), Russian society may suffer as aresult. Yes, for migrants with aresidence permit it is important toknow at least 200300words inRussian, the absence ofproblems with the law (here), preferably the investment ofcertain funds inthe Russian economy. More generally, nothing.

We need white Europeans. They are interested inthe novelty ofdiscoveries. Ithink, this may be some kind ofproductive love.

At the same time, the flow ofmigrants from the South-East should be rigidly, at least not completely, limited. Russia is the place where the West and the East meet? Maybe that makes sense. But so far, the Russian authorities are opening the way tothe East or, frankly, cheap labor, terrorism, the concept oflawlessness and submission tofate.

8. Inanew country, any registration at the place ofresidence is canceled. The metastasis ofserfdom (slavery) and the Stalin era ofstate terrorism are removed once and for all. Where do you live? You live there. We do not have toinform anyone about our place ofresidence.

Inaddition, the health insurance system is changing. At present, infact, residents are attached totheir polyclinics. This order ofthings generates medical separatism. When aperson with apermanent residence in, say, Kazan, can not take timely treatment inMoscow, and aMuscovite inTatarstan, at least without tedious documentary red tape, and this is adirect government sabotage.

Inaddition, it is necessary toadopt the system ofWestern countries (USA), when the medical policy operates inprivate medical institutions. It seems that Russian citizens, for the most part, do not even know that everything is normal inthis way. The people from Russian medicine divide the medical institutions into private and state ones. Inthe latter, asignificant part ofthe services is covered bythe MHI policy. Infact, the MHI should, somewhere partially, insome and all, pay for the services ofprivate clinics. Inmany developed countries (therefore, they are developed, that there is love, and not immediate benefit), the services ofprivate medical institutions are paid for bycompulsory medical insurance infull.

So, trust and all-round care ofaperson instead ofmedical separatism and web ofdocuments.

9. All attempts ofany state mechanisms todigitize aperson are declared illegal. At present, Russias integrity and stability are directly undermined bythe so-called Yarovoy Package. Tocreate acertain device for total listening, 4.5trillion is allocated. rubles (7annual budgets ofpublic health services). More precisely, all users will have topay for this (we). Do you know, dear friends, people inthe highest leadership ofthe Russian Federation, law enforcement agencies, who can be completely entrusted with our security? Those who will analyze the data ofahypothetical electronic informant you know? Did you choose them? So, who is this? Bortnikov, Kolokoltsov, Kudrin, Chubais, Yarovaya, Nabiullina, Putin, Yumashev, Shuvalov?

Even if only one-tenth or one hundredth (as always) will be used for the intended purpose anyway, everyone will be under the hood. Anyone can be deprived ofan electronic money account, the ability toearn, undergo treatment, move around the country, and out ofbounds, just one whim or mistake ofan unknown official. It must be recalled that the ultimate hardening ofthe System, its greatest rigidity and centralization, means collapse. As soon as this cast iron crystallizes, it will immediately burst. People are people. They can not live too long like this, obediently, like puppets, under the supervision ofthose persons who are already quite clearly becoming known as enemies ofthe human race.

The first option  citizens will fall into a stupor, simply refuse to produce anything. Approximately it was in the south of the USSR during the years of collectivization. No special resistance, nothing  residents just sit on benches and look at one point. Complete non-participation in state projects, tired sabotage, even with a view to starving to death.

The second option is senseless and merciless.

Inasociety oftrust and love, people look after each other, just like relatives inthe family. Much is forgiven. But, this way oforganizing aunit ofsociety is most effective. Families, where strict parents look at diaries ofchildren, their phones, pockets, place video cameras inrooms, near the bed, inthe bathroom, the toilet, constantly suspect the child insomething reprehensible, um, they say that they say we saw everything that was inthe bathroom from such families, adolescents escape. Yes, and we are no longer children.

10. Creation ofinstitutes offormation ofmentality ofcitizens. The first step is various kinds ofelectives (on avoluntary basis, or for afee) from teachers and lawyers. Knowledge ofthe law. How todefend their rights. Grouping toprotect their interests. Phones Rospotrebnadzor, Consumer Protection Society. Where is the court building, the procedure for contacting the Prosecutors Office. Also, according tothe American model (hereinafter inthe text more fully) what should we do toprevent adictatorship. Why is it so important tochange the power, etc., etc.,etc.

11. Church reform correlates with paragraph 10. The church should be elected. Priests are appointed from worthy parishioners. The provision that the church must necessarily be friends with the bureaucratic apparatus, that this is akind ofmore or less successful commercial enterprise, is canceled.

12. For the comprehensive development of the citizens of the new country, the creation of a basis for the representation of this power among newly converted foreigners, a Museum of General History should be created. Imagine  a three-dimensional book, a filmstrip,  a multifaceted exposition explaining the common vision of World History. This is important, more, perhaps, than you imagine.

So. The museum. Partially under the open sky. Dwellings ofdifferent eras. The core is Russia, from the beginning ofthe last millennium. Huts. One the most common, the second inthe style ofmansions, with terrets, carved shutters, etc., just adream. The construction ofthe temple before Nikons reforms, and after. So ingeneral, for all countries inthe world. Donjon yurt, North American tipi. The main thing is dwellings, temples, and military equipment.

Almost everyone insuch amuseum is areplica (made bymodern masters) on ascale of1: 1. Through military equipment it is convenient toshow the progress ofscience. Good or bad, weapons have aspecial status. Without comfortable habitation and delicacies tolive it is quite possible. But weapons are ameans ofdefense. It depends on life itself, and therefore it is significant almost tothe same extent as the religious buildings.

Everywhere adetailed explanation ofwhy this happened. Not just astatement offact and ashort inscription. History is politics, and everything that determines the state inwhich people exist today.

Only one book is written that represents History quite fully and consistently: it is the "Bible of Time", or "The History of almost Total 1,2". If you want all of our plans to come true, start with yourself. Get the book (it's best in the printed form, there is such a function). Put it in a prominent place, talk hoarsely with relatives and friends. Only then does the word become a thing. Opinions that, oh-0, now, this is just such an advertising trick of the author, we all know this ourselves  are indignantly indignant.






1.Variant ofHistory almost Total, The Bible ofTime with automatic translation into English. The printed book is recommended for the guidance offoreigners. 2. The real story ofthe Second World War. An instructive thing for family reading. 3, 4. Volumes ofHistory almost Total, suitable for printing (and reliable preservation). Electronic text inasingle book The History ofAlmost Everything



13. Inthe matter ofaccepting new citizens from among white aliens, it is very important, you know, tocontrol the face. We, the controllers ofthis process will have toforget about hypocrisy, and not least tothink about the appearance, the genetics ofnew converts. Infact, dear reader, you also know that agood person from the inner bad can be distinguished inappearance.

14. Army reform. This organization should become, among other things, aplace for teaching young people topopular working specialties (machine tools, production, modern welding, driving), courses ofaparamedic aparamedic, and so on. The basics ofjurisprudence and business are given. Demobilized, reserve soldiers are usually rapidly atomized. Find friends, reliable companions insuch afragmented world is difficult.

The service life is increased bysix months (for those who wish), but the soldier receives significant bonuses. Including this is the official status ofadeserved person, badges, badges,etc.

Areal military man, modeled on the legionnaire ofAncient Rome (and this is avery serious state) should be able not only todestroy (or tobeat the buckets), but also tobuild the state.

15. Creation ofakind ofForce Places, Mayakovs, Soviets, byinitiative groups from the people, or even, at the initial stage, individuals. Ideally, this is asmall fortress, akind ofdungeon, asign ofstrength and power ofthe nation. Here, people can gather, discuss important news, schedule actions, freely trade, entertain themselves, learn todo business and own weapons. Read more about this inthe third part ofthe book: Advice.

16. On the basis ofthe Peoples Councils, anew Government is being formed. People, how many have mastered the management scheme on the mountain (here is another name for the seat ofthe Force) have the opportunity toform the Supreme Government. Infact, there is nothing particularly complicated here, it is hardly more tiring than learning how touse apersonal computer (remember, dear reader, you also once thought it was something unthinkable). The basic principles are perfect transparency, control bythe people, regular turnover. At present, we recall that the government ofthe country, the Parliament, other structures ofpower, infact, elect themselves. We do not know these people never talked tothem. Voting for the election ofnew members ofthe government, now and quite officially, is conducted inthe same bureaucratic corridors.

These institutions (now) are not the vehicles ofthe will ofthe people. Corporate ethics, the charter, does not allow representatives ofthe party (for example, ER) tovote on any issue ofarrangement ofthe country other than consolidated. This all sends us back tothe time ofthe Bolshevik Party, the Stalinist terror, the general famine and the destruction ofthe economy (except, perhaps, the military-industrial complex, which is probably swollen like aleech).

So, it is necessary tohave aSystem inwhich some trained, enterprising and respectable representatives ofthe nation monitor the cash flows ofthe state budget, the activities offunctionaries, collect all the data about them, and, relying on numerous, close-knit Soviets, have the opportunity toapply areasonable Force.

17. Reform ofthe media and, inthe first place, the cinema. Providing access toinitiative, understanding and (let me say this word) soulful people tothe means ofproducing films. Elimination ofthe state funding ofmasterpieces ofcertain maestros ofcinema, beloved bythe authorities (such as S. Mikhalkov, A. Zvyagintsev, A. Sokurov, P. Lungin, K. Shakhnazarov). Creation ofafilm rental system that ensures the payback ofcinematography (including on the Internet), including films ofbeginners, but talented directors, shot on their own, or borrowed from private producers, money.

And further



Dear friends, we perfectly know that power must be replaced. Otherwise, it degenerates, forgets its purpose and, instead ofarranging ajust society, begins towork exclusively on itself.

Quite possibly, inmany Jewish youths and girls, the idea ofaspecial purpose, adirect connection with God, for the sake ofenlightenment and raising up toits high level other simple people, is initially fired. The process ofcollecting certain qualities inone people, as if an extensive dynasty, has visible success. Idefine the energy ofJews at 1015% higher than the average. Well, or more correctly, they have abrighter, than average, desire tosay something and do it. Reasonable ambition, spiritual strength, aspiration for unification allow, among other things, totake power over many communities indifferent countries ofthe world.

But, as already mentioned, the non-replaceability ofsuch power, as if bysome law ofnature, entails many unpleasant excesses. If Jews gain access toland ownership, they immediately try tobuy them all, as much as possible, and enslave the peasants living on them. The expulsion ofJews from most European countries, the ban on the purchase ofland all this was done over and over again not because ofthe inherent harm ofEuropean peoples and their aristocracy, but only as an extreme measure ofprotecting the interests ofthe local population.

Jews go into commerce, usury and entangle all countries ofthe world with anetwork ofdebt bondage.

Inthe world banking system alot ofuseful. However, when the power over it is strong, almost tightly captured byacertain group ofpeople, and is inherited this is not entirely correct.

If the media, cinema, literature gather only their own, and so gently, culturally, politely do not let strangers with their works, this is also not good. At the same time, acult ofour own, blood-sucking, initially quite ordinary people is created.

So, aman pulled off acouple ofequations from the Frenchman A. Poincar, avery interesting formula for the dependence ofmass on energy for the Englishman J. Thomson, as everything was arranged and, please. World media announce the greatest scientist ofour time, A. Einstein.

The actress pronounces the phrase Do not fret me about, Mulia inthe only feature film and Russian literary resources are still teeming with works that praise the inimitable Faina Ranevskaya.

.. These people are terribly distorting the original design ofthe Russian people, seizing power over the Soviets (promising governing bodies created on the ground byworkers collectives) and, together with those from the Caucasus, immerse the country inthe abyss ofthe Thirty Years CivilWar.

After another seventy-five years, they leave their strange experiments and tidy up their industry, resources and the entire banking sector ofthe huge now former Soviet Union.

And inthe first and second case there is very little love for the state-forming people, used as if human material without areal soul. Or, it is not at all. There is not so useful for the establishment ofasingle strong state ofblood ties. And therefore everything that is done is done as something very ugly.

The Anglo-Saxons and Jews, the two leading nations ofthe world, are said tobe insome kind oflove and harmony, as they look after each other. And, if there is acrack inthis system ofmutual deterrence, the world obviously expects Armageddon.






Larry Silverstein, owner ofthe development company Silverstein Properties



North America is agreat example ofthe cooperation ofany religious Jews and Anglo-Saxon Protestants. Inparticular, they both honor the Old Testament (Tanakh), see the Jewish Bible as examples for imitation, cite byheart ancient prophets, etc. These people consider the material success inearthly life as arecognition ofthe merit ofman byGod, evidence that he everything does the right thing, and will be rewarded inthe next life.

On July 23, 2001, the representative ofthe oldest leading nation, Larry Silverstein, makes out an agreement for the acquisition oftwin towers ofthe WTC. Under the terms ofthe contract, the money is transferred inparts. Until September 11ofthe same year, only $ 30million is paid. Inthis case, insurance is made for skyscrapers (aseparate item is aterrorist act) $ 3.6billion. Since the planes destroy both buildings, Larry requires 7.2billion, and after lengthy litigation receives about 8billion (including, for the third, 47-story building ofWTC-7, collapsed for no apparent reason afew hours after the terrorist attack). How much money an entrepreneur otsuzhivaet from airlines and airport security services (initially the amount ofthe claim is 12billion dollars). Gold ingots with atotal price ofabout abillion, stored inthe cellars ofbuildings, seem tobe completely evaporated. We add that the towers ofthe WTC are unprofitable initially (as Silverstein could not have known), their seals use so unloved byAmericans asbestos, and after computerization ofthe entire planet, most ofthe work on making deals is done outside the walls ofexpensive offices.

At the same time, the US gets an excuse toattack Iraq and invade Afghanistan. It is these countries that have been found guilty ofthe largest, at the present time, terrorist act. The vast military-industrial complex, the American army, since the collapse ofthe Soviet Union, feeling the lack offunds, once again get open access tothe state budget (allocations are doubled, only Afghanistan and Iraq are allocated 3 trillion dollars). The monetary contentment ofthe law enforcement agencies is sharply increased. Powers ofstate security structures are expanding.

Later, the strongest blows tothe United States and the European Union are received byLibya and Syria.

Both these countries, just like Iraq, we recall, are Israels natural enemies.

 We can sympathize with Israel and its heroic Defense Army, which is trying to preserve peace and prosperity on its land by classical military methods. But, to use another, a huge country and its inhabitants for their own needs, in symbiosis with its special services, adjusting a terrifying and inhumane terrorist act is too much.



This God (which not only for the Jews) can not approve.



Let me remind you that the September 11, 2001terrorist act has akind offorerunner. Thus, on June 8, 1967, Israeli planes without identification signs, for several hours, are attacked (clearly identified bythem) bythe American intelligence vessel Liberty. 34sailors are dying. The idea ofan operation carried out with participation ofsome structures ofthe highest US administration is provocation, involvement ofthe US inthe war with Egypt on the side ofIsrael. The shelling ofadestroyer ceases only when the US military restores part ofthe antenna (destroyed bythe Israelis first) and sends asignal toits Sixth Fleet.

Im not ashamed tosay that Ilove America. Therefore, friends, the realization that the system ofchecks and balances init has given aserious crack, and democracy is based only on an honest word, and the silence ofastill well-fed people, is very depressing. Its also sad that almost the whole world, having watched TV stories (for example, with the apparent incongruity ofthe Pentagons attack, obviously not apassenger liner), is quite content with the narrative presented bythe US Government.

Maybe the Anglo-Saxons and Jews, the military and the financiers are now asingle conglomerate Or, completely and completely here did the latter win? Inthe buildings ofthe Pentagon, the CIA, the FBI, there were violent shootings, stripping, the destruction ofall the remaining dissenters? We do not know anything about this with you, friends. It seems agood topic for an instructive film, if only we had worthy directors.

Most likely, the holding force (at least some religious and decent) Anglo-Saxons, with afight, surrendered its position. Now inthe world there is only one, non-replaceable earthly authority.

And this is wrong.

 We can develop, and realize the idea that the time has come to form a fundamentally new leading nation. Yes, not from absolute zero, but on the basis of all the best that the Western world and the Jewish tradition can offer us. But, for this it is necessary to diligently, zealously ask God for the sanction of chosenness, serious work, suffering and accomplishments  individually, and together with blood-related people.



The key words here are love and trust.






  . , ,     ,  ,    ,       ,       The New Land ( Novaya Zemlya) Archipelago. Let's imagine that if we removed the boring military bases, everything unnecessary, including even the old names, it would be possible to establish a basic habitat here, the forge of the cadre of the fundamentally new leading nation of the planet 



    蠖 ,   .  ,    ?

       ,   ?

 ,          ;    ,      .

    ,     ,      ?



The most powerful bureaucratic superpower ofour time is, ofcourse, our Russian Federation. Do you want this toalways remainso?

Are we able tofree ourselves from the networks ofconstantly hanging laws that cram the movement?

Lets look at History, which is akind ofBible ofcivilization through biographies ofsignificant figures oftime; from the leader ofthe USSR Georgy Malenkov, who came toreplace Stalin until our days oflife.

How tochange the current state ofthings, tomake our house look like what we worked so hardfor?






       ,    ,  The cover design uses an image of the tractor Marvin Himeyer, an uncompromising fighter for his rights, the national hero of America




  Р Ҡ Π





 ,  





 



 . 堖 1901, ,  ,     ,   ; , ,   ,   , 23-      ...

     (堖 . )  ,  ,  ( ,  ,   ),     ,     .   -,   , ,     ࠖ     -  .            ࠖ  .    ࠖ  ,    Π.

 1948., ,       (). ,   1942. ,  . ,      16.   (  ), 35.  ,         .

         . 䠖   1948.   ,  ,     .     (,  ,     )    .       ( ,    ), ,  ,           (, ,    )    ().

      ,     .

    ,    , , ,     . ,  ,   1953.        ;      . ,      ,  . ,   , .

 ,  ࠖ   ,   ()    (1613)     (1912)     ( )  .

            (   ), , ,    ,   .     .   .          .    .

  ⠖  , .

     ,  1953.,       ,   ,    (    ).      ,  (     );  ,  ,  ,       .    ,      , (    ),   .   .  ( )      .  . ,      ,   ,  ,       .           ,    .

  ,   : -, .   ,    - ,     -,   . ʠ1958,     ,      (  ) .      --,   :        .

     - .  ,      -,      .      ,        . ,         (1957).

       .   ,         . , 1961.    ,   .

  ,    ,  ,    ,     .   ,   (  ) .        1988. 頖   ,    . .

 . ࠖ  ,    ,  .






 



 . 堖 894., .    ()  ,    ,    .  1918.     ,   .     ,   ,  ,      .        , 1934.         .

 1938.      ʠ,      (   , , ),       .     (  1920.,   ) , -  (1939)     .  120,      ,  , , .; -  .      (  ,  ),   . ,        (   )     ( ).

 194142.   -  ,    ,        , ⠫ ,      . ,  ,  ,   -   .

     .

 1946.  - ,  ( )   . ,   1946        ,  ,    (    ),   . , ,    , ..  -     .   . , ,    ,   .       (,  ,   )  800 .

 ,  ʠ,    ,       Π   ,      养.     ,   , ,   ,    .

  ,  -         , ,     頖 .

 1953.,  . ,  (  )   ..  ,  .        ,  (     ,        ),   ,        (   ࠫ).   , ,       . .

 1954. ,          ,   ,  ,    ﻠ  .          .      25 1954.     .     . ,    ,        .

      .   , ,       , , , ,       ,    , ,     , .     ,      (Ġ   ,   , ..),  , ,   堖     ,  , ,  .

 , , ,     ,    ,    .  , , ..     ;   ,  .        .

 ,    .  ,   -,   .   :   , ,   , , , ?   .     . , .    ,   ,        . ,  ,  ,  , ,     .

     .          .  ࠖ    .        , ,   ,     .       .     ,     .

     ,   ,   . 堖    , ,    ,       .     -,  ,   .

            . ,      ,       .  蠖  ,  ,    .   :       , ,  .       ,  ,       .

   -       , .        . ,     (  )      .   ,      -    .

        ,      蠫, , , ,   .   ,     ,    , ,  (   ),     .  ,       .

  ,    . ,    .   ,     . ,  ,  ,   ,   :    .    (  ) ,   

 , ,        -  .  ,  ,  ,    .   ,  ,      .  ,  ,  ,  ,    ,  .    蠖  ,  . ,          . ,   ,     .   ,      .

Р      .    ࠖ  . 蠖    (          ),     .   36  (2017).    ,  ,       ?

           ,        : , ,  ,   .

     .  ,  ,  蠖 ? , .  , ,       ,      .

Ƞ   :

  ࠖ    .             ,    .    50.  .       40%  . , -    ,       .  -    ,     .

  ,    -  . ,       .       . Ѡ   (, -),       ,   .

    ,     ,   ,      .   ,  .  ( ),    ,  25 .     - ,    , ,     ,   .   1957.    頖   .    ,    .       ,         .     , ,  ,     .       - .           .    11.          .

     ,     ,  .      .

 ,  ,         ,  ,     .

 1961.  ,      . .       .      ,  ,    -    - .  ,      .    , ,       .       ,   ,       ࠫ .

     ,      .    .       310.

       ;  ,      -  ,   .         ,  , ..Ӡ    ,    .

  1962. .          .    30%,    .         (     )     ,    .   蠖   ,    ,  .

   ,            .

   ,      .  .        .  ,      ,  .       ,   , (  ,     ,    )    .

Ӡ         () .    ,   . ʠ  , ,            ( ,   ).      .     ⠖        .      ,   , ,   , .    26.  11 ,        ,    ,   .

  .    ,   .     Π  1956.,   ,     .  , - -   -       ,   .  , ,  . ,  ,   ,        .        ,    .

 , ,   .  ,  ,  ,  -    .  1964.  ..     .   ,    -  , ,   ,   , .           .    ,   ,   ,   .  1971.     .

 .   ,  .  , - -7,  ,    ( , 1943).

   , ⠖    .  ,   ,   , .  : ,    -,   ໠   .     (-)      . ,      ,      4   , , ,    ( ) ,  ,   .  ,         ,      ,   .     (  1956. )     ( ,     ).        堖       (19291932.)     .

 ꠖ ..        , ,  .




  :  ,  





 






-5,    



 . 堖 1896., .   .  ,            . Ѡ19171921. ⠖   ,   . 堖      .   ,        .    ,   ,     (1926).   1916.,        1300 .    Р   1924.    --15. ,   ,     - ,     ,    .

   , 蠖    30-     .       ,  ,  ,  ,   (1931.   )   .     Autocar-5S  -3,    .     -.  1934.       100000.

 1939.      .             ,    .        .    150000.     ,          .

  ( ) 1951.            .

, ,     ,  ,  ,   1 (1953).  ,    ,       First Automobile Works (FAW),       .

  ꠖ -4331,   1,6.,      .  2016.      ,   ,         .

 19531956. ⠖      .   ,     1956.    (,  , 蠫  )   .. ().

 . ࠖ ,  .    .






 



 . 堖 1905., .    ( . )  , ,  -   , 蠫 .  ,   ,   .     ( ,       )     . ,   ,  ,       .   1 1935.   - 102 ,   7,     14.  ࠖ     ;   ,     (   ),   , .  ,       .      ,   ⠖     .   220,     2530. Π    .

    ,  ,   ,     (),     .   .    ,  ,    ,        .

,   .    ,  ,     ,   .     ,   (  ),      ,    堖    .

    14- .    ,   30-   , . ,       2 ,  .

 1936.   .        Ѕ    ,   .       (   ,   ).  ,  蠫  .   ,    .  :        ,      ,    .

      .     ,    -1,    ,     , .   ,    , .        (),     .

 1943.    ,    ( ).   ⠫廠    , ,    ,  .

 1957. ,        ,   ,   .      ,    .       .       ,    .   ( ) !?.

 .    .  ,    ,     .   .        .  ,      .      .      ,    ,   .  1970.    ,   . ,  ,     ,  .         ,   (     ),   .       ,    , .., ..

   .    .    .  (1977)   .   ,    , , ,     .

   .

 :   頖  .      ,   ,   .    ⠫, , ,  ,  .

.  ,    ,     .        .    .  ,   ,     ,        .

      . ,         , ,  (    , , ) ,    ,  . Ѡ 1937.       ,      ,   .

           ?   ࠖ ,     . ,    , , ,    (   ),      . : ,  ,     ,     .




 ,  ,  





 



 . 堖 1904.,    19191921.     ,    ,       .  1930.    ,     ( )  . Ѡ1936.      ,     .

 ,       ,  ,       1937.  ,      ࠖ        ,         -  (  )  ,      . ʠ,    ,    . ,   , 1939.        .        ,    ( 1500 ),      , .. 1948.,   ,   ,     .       ,      ().  1953.  ,       ,    ,   .   , 1964..    (-) .

    . Ѡ ,        . Ѡ頖     ;   ,  ,      .   ,     :  ,   ,     .      .     ,  .       .     ,      ,        .       .      .

,        .    33% .   .      ,   , ,  -  (.. ).        ,  , ,   ,   ,  ,   .

    . ,  ,   蠖    , , ,   ,     . , ,   ,      .

    .  1968.        .  6  .

 1979..,           . ,        .          1980.,        .   -     ,   ,       .  ,     ,   19811985.  ,  堫黠    

 .  , ,     ,.

   ,  , . 蠖  ,  ,   .






 



 . 堖 1906., .  (. ),   (  , ),   ,   - . 1929. . ⠖  .      ,                ..     ,   -,     .       18- ,  , ,         . ,   4 1943.         . ,   , -    , , ,   , , .,  ,    .    , ,   225.   ..   ,  ,       ,   . 24 1945.  -,       .

 , . ⠖    ,     ...

Ѡ , .,      ,    ,    .

Ѡ 1960..⠖     .     , ,   堖   .  1964.     ,  ( )  . ,    ,  ,    Ϡ,  ( )  ,   ,  .    , ..      .   ,   ,   (  ) ,  ,         (   ),    .

, 1965.    .         2,2.  ,    :       . ,  ,        .  -    , , ,    (  )   .

  .    56,  , 10ꠖ   . , ,  ,  ,      ,   ,    , ,   ,     ,  .  , , , ,  ,   (       ).    , ,   .      .    ,             ,    IBM 360;       .  1969.    :    ARPANET,     ,     ,   .        .

Ƞ   .

        .  , , . ,      . ,      ,  -     ,   ; ,   ,     .

..  ,    (, ,    ), ,   .  . -  .      ,   ,  , ,     ,  .     ,  ,     ;    .   ,    . ,    -64, -72, (  ,   ,  )    ;  ,   -24 .

  ,  ,    ,   .         : Р 18%, 6%.

   , 2 1970. 5,5. 1985. ,   ,   , ,        . ,      .

Ѡ1964.   ,           ().  , ,   .  (1949) .,       19451947. , ,    ( ),   ,   0,5.   ( , ,    )   480   .          800 ꠖ ,   ( - )   .

 , ,   .  蠖    () . ,   ,        .  ,   ; ,         ,    ,      ,    .          .     ,  蠖 - , ,     ,  ,  ,    , , -.   , ,      ,   ,   ,  .   ,   . , ,     ,  ,   ,   ,     .

 1965.    ,      -2 -2. ,        .    , ,      ( , )   .      (1955.) ,  , , ,         .          ,   () .       8.      . ,      , ,   -2,    (   ) .    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,     (  )   ,     400    . ,  ,      ,   0,4 4. Ƞ ,   - ,      - ,     .   ,   򻠖   ,        .       ,  ,          .   ,       , -. ,  -       ,        , ..       ,   堖  .   ,     :    , ,  ,    ,      . ,          :  ,  ,     , , ,       .

    ,   (  ),    ,       ;      .

,               .  ,      , , ,    .     -      ,  ,    -   ,      (, ,   ).

    .      - ,     ,   ,   ,   (  -   )    .

:     ,     ,        . ,      (,  , .., )  ,  300  ,  , 4000,  , ..,  ,    .

 ,       - ,    .  , ,   ,   ,  , , ,   ,    - .

   ,  -   15. ,     ,      .      , ,    .           ࠖ   .          (     ),      .  -  ,    . Ѡ       녻    .

,  , ,   ,       ,   ,      .     ,    .  ,    , ,   ,    ,   ,   .      , ,  .    .  ,     , ,     ,      .

    ,       .    ,        ,     .

,       :  ,     . ,        .    : 4, 5.      ,   ,  .    ,   .  .     :    ,   ,     .  2011.  , ,       .  , ,         .                  (, , ,   ).

,   -    . , -   , , ,  , .,     .     , , .  ,   ࠖ    .

, ,  , ,    ,        , ,     .   蠖 -,   .      , , , , - ,  ,  , ࠖ . ,  ,  ,  .

  ?    ,   , , ,    ? ,      .    ,    ,   ,      ,  .

        , ,   , ,      . ,   ()     ,  ,  ,    , ,    (, ),      .        . ,    ,  ,    , . ,     , , -    ,       . , ,  ,       .  ,   ,    ⠫ ,   .  ,      1975   3-   ;     ,  ,    ,    ࠖ  ,      .

 1977...  , ,  ,  ,    , , ,    . Ѡ16             .    ,  ,   ,      ,   .    ,  ,         ,  .       , ..; ,  ,  ,             .    .     頖  ,         .      ,   ,   , .

  ,  .  . ,        . Ƞ,         ,  , , -   ,   .  ,     ,    ,     ,    .

    ᠫ,    廅      ,        ? Ƞ    ⠫. ,  , ,  ,  .

 ,     ,   ,    .   ,    ,    .  ,  ,      ,   - ..      . ,    :    ( ) ?!,   ,   .

..     .        ,     . Ӡ       ,   .   ,     ,   ( )     , ,   :    .

 ,     :    ,   -  ,   ,     .

     1982.    ,         .  ,   ,      ,   ,  ,    ,      

 :    (. ) 1927.,  .    ,   (..   ).






 ,  1950- 



 . 堖 1908., . ,  ࠖ      ,     ().     ,    ,   . Ѡ1937. (  ) -,   .  1941. 33-      .  ,. ,                .     -. Ѡ1946.  ,       .  1957. ..   . , 1964.   . Ѡ1976. ⠖    ,  , ..  ,   .   1984.,   ;     ,     .   ,    . ,        ,  ,     (      ).

 :  , , .      : 10:1.

 : ..   ,        .   -   ,     ,  ,   .  .     .    ,    .      .       ,   -   . ,          . ..     -     ,             .     蠫 ?  ,    ,    -, ?   .      , ,   ,        ?  ,  ,   ?    ,     ,   ? ,  ,  ()      ,    ?!

 ,      ,     .   :   ,  , ,    ,     .

     . ,   ,       .   , ,        ,    , .






   , 1949.






., 1902 1982,   ,    ( ). ,  ,   , , ,     .   . ,      .     (  ).






  , 1827 1907,     ,  , -  ,  .     ,   ,         .  , , ?




 ,  





 



 . 堖 1914.,   ()  ,  ,    .     ()      . Ѡ1951.  ,    ,      ()      .              .  1962.      .           . ⠖  ,           (1968)  (1979).   ..   ()   -   .

 1982.,   , .       ,  堖     . ,     , ..      ࠖ , ,   ,   .    .     ,      , , ,  .     30%  .        컅      . , , ࠖ    .     , ,      , ,     ,   .

,      ,     ,         . 1 1983., ,    ,  .     747 .       .        ,     46

Ѡ 1983.   ,    .             (1984).

 . ࠖ  () 1935.,  .      ,    .  ࠖ  ().    ,  .    . 堖   

 .     400000  (  ),   5.  .      ,  ,   ,     . , ,   ,      ,        頖   ?   (     ),   , ..,     ..   -    ( , 蠖 ,         ).       ,  頖        , , ,    (  , .).    ,  .    , - ,   , .   , ,    ,  , , , , .






 



 . 堖 1931., .            ..    .   (1955),    ,     ()  ̅       .  1978...      . 1985.         ..      ,   ,  ..,      (   ).

       .   , ࠖ .      ,    . ࠖ      .     ,        .  .   ,  , , ,  ,  ,      ,  ( ). , ,   ,    ,     ,  - ,     ,  .

,     ,    (),     , .  70%       ,     .     .  ,    , , ,  ,     , (   ,   )  . ,   ,   , ,    - .

       .    , ,     .  :    ,  ,  ,      (     ,  ).      蠖  . ,    ,    ,       . ,  ,  ,   () ,  .

      : ,     , ,    (1015)  , , ,   ,    , .. ,   . ,    ,      .     , ,         ()   .

      .    , ,    蠫,  -  , .  ,     ,  ,   ,   (    ).

    .  , ,  ,  , , . ,  ,       , , ,   .   ,  - , - ,   ,  ,  , ,     ,   ,   .

 .     . ,         , , , :  ,  , ,  ,  , -,   -.  -  ,      ,     .

    , 19 1986    .  ,     . , ,      (1991., 26), ,    (2007)   . ,  ,    ,        .       .

 ,      (    ,  ),  ,      ,      ( ,  ).       .

    , , , ..,  (.., , )       .      ,       .

   ,    ,   ,    ,   . ,  , , ,  ;      , ,   , . ,  ,  ,   , ,    ,  ,  ------.

  1986.      , ..  .  -       .   (  )   ,    ,    .       , .   ,   ,   , ,         ,    .

       .           . ,  ,  , ,     , ,  ᠖     . ,  , 19951990.     -  100.  .

, ,       .       .  ,      ,          ? , ,  ».  ,  , .     .

 ,      () .  蠖   .  ,   . ,     , ,     .      .        , , . ,  -   ,         ,     .   , . Ƞ, ,    100.  ,     .

15 1990.,       (   ) .    .     .

 , 12 1990.,         . ,  ,        .   ( )   ,  .  ,        .

,   . ,    ,      ,   ,   .    .     ,      ..Ϡ      1991.     ().   . 8 1991.  ,  ,    (  )       ( ).  ,   (   ),     (..  ). ,   -  ;  ,         ( ) . , ,    ,    ,    ,  , ,   .    , 25 1991.      (, ,    )     .       

     .

 . ࠖ   (), 1953., .    1999. ,       .     , 10.  , , ,   .  .  100.        .    ,        ,    ,    90- .

    (     ,  ), 17-  (),     . , , ,  ,   ,    Pizza Hut, Louis Vuitton (), , ,   .

 :    ,  ,  (  ). Ӡ    ,   .    堖 , , ,    ,     . ,   ,  ,  :  , ,   ,   젖 .




  ɠ





 , Ѡ, Р,  





 



 . 堖 1946., .    (  . )      (  - )   .  19681969.     ,  ,  ,       . 1973.  -  , ,    ,       . 1983(    )        軅  .   ,  ,    ,  .

 1989, ,  ,  ,   ǻ ,   ,   . Ѡ1994.,             (AVVA), ,     (,  , , ,   , Chevrolet Niva ).   ,     ,   ,     ,    .   ,   ߻  .  1995.       (),    .              , -6,  ,  ,  ,  , , , , .

Ѡ1996.,      , 頖   .

...        .    . ,      .  ,  (  , ,   () , ,  )      ,   .  ,    蠫     . ,   , ,  ,   ,         .

  2001.,      ,         ,   ....    ,      ; ,  ,  .  , ,  ,       (2012),      л.  렖   -      , , ,  ,   ,   .

 2004.     ,       ,  , -  .  ,  ,    堖      .   , . , , ,          .   ,   ,  (  ) , 蠖 .  .

頖 -   .  ,    ,  ,   ,    .

 ,     , 젖  (    ).  2012.     ,   -  .      蠖           蠖   .    . 렖    (.8:44).             ,        , , ,           .  蠖     ,   ,   (, ,      ),  ,  ,  - , -,  .   ,      .

   렖  ,   ,  蠖  ,  ,  ,   ( ).

 ,   ,     , .

   .  ,   ,   ,     .

       .

         , -       -  .    蠖   .

       - :

       .         ,        .

 䠖  .       ,      ,     .

  ,   .         (),       , .

, ,     , .       ,    .                   .

 ꠖ   . ,          ,        .  ,      蠖          蠖      .

堖 ,  ,   ,   ,  . . Ӡ   ,    , ,   ,    !

 !

     . ,    ,     ( ).       , 23 2013.    ( ),    ,     .  ,  ,    ,      .  The Guardian -   .

      (350. ) -  ( ).  ,   ࠖ  ,       .

 .  ࠖ  (),   ,  .  ꠖ  (), 1991.,  .  1993.   ,   ,         200.   .      ,      , 2013,   , , ,    ,     .  , ,  .






 : 1. 2. 3.  ,  1999.



1.. 堖 1931., .    (   ࠖ     -)     ..    -.   ,  ,     .       , , ,  , , ,   (1957). Ѡ1966.     .      ,     ,    ,      . ,     ,.  1985.     , ,    ,   23-     (   ) ,       (   ).  ,  ,...   .

Ѡ1979.,.     .  1981.       .  1985,   ,   ,   ,    ,     .

    ,...        .       (,    ),   ,    ,    . ,   ,  ,      (    ),   , , ..Ѡ 1987    ,    . ,   ,  .     ࠫ     .  ࠖ  ,   ,    . ,     .   1990.      . 12           .  ,  ,     .    , , .   ...  , . ,   .

,  ,  1990.,  ,     .   ,       : , , , - , , - , ,  .     ( ,    ) .

   , ..   Р , ,  ,   .      (24 1990)     .

   , ,     -  ,   (50. .) .      . ,    ,     .   ,       ,  ,  .      ,      ,        .

    ,       (  ).     ࠖ  17 1991.     . ,     ( , , , )  ; ,    , , ,  ,  .

12 1991., 57%  , .

  ,  ,   . ,   Π    л 蠫Π          ,   л. , ,  ,    (, ,   )        .

20      .   ,  ,   , , ,  ;      , ,  .

Ѡ      .  ( ,     )  , , , -    .  ,       (), 1821   . , -, ,       .     ,     ,   ,   (   )  䠖 , , .    ,   , -- , , .

     , ,    ,   .       ,   .

,    .  à   ,        .

   ,  , ..,      . ,  ,   , 1990. ,        ,  ,    , ,    .

 1993   ,   (  )   . , , - ( 1990)          .       ( - )            . , , , ,       ,  .  , , -    ( 1977.),       .

,  ,    , 300 , 3 4 . .     . Π ,  ,  .

  1991.   ,    .       ,    .   30 .

   , ,      Ԡ       ,     .

    , , -,    ,    . ,     ,     ,   ,     ,   ,  .

11 1994.,   Π             .     .   80 . ʠ,  ,  ,     () -,      ,   .  1996.,      ,    .  ,  ,  ,   ,    ,     .  ,    ,  ,      (, .),    ,        (1999)

, , ,   .  , , . ,   , , ,        . ,    ,  , ,           ,     ,     .

 1996.,    ,  , ..,.    . ,   ,       .   ,      1999.

    ,  , .

 1999.      .    蠖   ,   (    ),        ()   ( ). ,               .   -,    .    ,       ,

,   , - ,    .

      (   ),   ,  .     :

  .     . ,    ,   .

,            :  .  .

  ,   ,  , , ,  ,  . , ,        , , -  , ,   -  . -        ,  , ,  -  ,  . ,  ,    ,    ,   .

   2007.,  . ,  ,     (20002007)      .

 . ࠖ  (25-   )  (),   ,  .

2. . 堖 1952., . ,            .  , 1970.      (  ,  ),     ().      (5- ,   ),  蠖   (      -).    , ,      ,       (1991).     ,  - .   ࠖ     ,  , ,  .  1995. ...,           젖 . ...        (NDI);         (      ).

 1997..     (-    -  ).   (    ),  1620  ...       -   ().   ,      ( )  ,    .

 1996..      ( ),      . Ѡ 1998. ...      ().

 12 , 1999.       ( ) .

Ѡ     .    20 2000. 140. 2008. (.., 7)       ,        19972000. (  ).  ,  ( )        .  ,     20002013.    (17500. ):  .

     ࠖ  .     3, 6ࠖ 5415.     .   (       ) .

1 2001.  ,     蠫 젖    -   . ,  -  蠫      .  ,       ,   ,    (    ) .  ,  , ..      .      :

ʠ2008.       ,   ,     .

 2005.         

ʠ2010.     --, -- 

ʠ2017.      .

  (  )    .   ,       (2003).  :         ,            .

  2004..    .             (   ).   2013.,  ..., ,   , ,   ,      . ʠ 2006.      6688 .

         .   , , ,    ,       ,   .     蠖  ,     (, , , ..).

   , 20002008. ( , ,   )  2,2, , , 2. .      1,2.  .  , , ,   (    106,     34). 堖   ,     -, ,     .

 2013.,  ࠫ ,     , , ,    ,        . ,   ..   .        (     ) .




  .


   .

   ,     (https://www.litres.ru/lim-vord/novaya-zemlya-new-earth/)  .

      Visa, MasterCard, Maestro,    ,   ,     ,  PayPal, WebMoney, ., QIWI ,       .


