, COVID?
  

 


  
       .      ,      ,        .     .     ,  ,        .

 ,      ,  ,   COVID,     .   , COVID?    ,                 .     ,        .



  PDF A4    .





 

, COVID?







  


 ,             . ,   ,    .          廠 ,    .        , ,    , ,   ,      1666,                .        ,     .    .    , ,     .    ,    .

 COVID-19 ,     ,      . ,   ,           .          ,      .

       ,    1991   .       .    ,       ,   ,     . , ,           ,          .

      -           .  -, -, -, -,   ,    , ,             .

      ,    ,   :    Zoom,   YouTube    Facebook.       .       ,   :      ,      ? ,   .     ,      ⠫ .

,     ,    .     .

-,      ,        2020.    ,       .     .         .

-,  .  SARS-CoV-2   ,      .              .  , COVID?   ,     : , , , ,             .     ,           . ,    .

-,   ,      ,          ,       .    ,  ,       .       ,          .

    ;    ,               SARS.     COVID-19,        ,  ,   ,     ,         ,     ,   ,     .

  Scio ()  ,    COVID-19      .  Autonomeco ()          . Reagoj () ,         ,    ,       ,   ,        .  Societo ()  ,       ,   , ,    .

        ,      , .     -  .          ,    ,    .   , ,            .           .    ,      (   ?   !),   .        ,    ,          .                     .

    컠 ,     .      .   ,         .     Respublica Literaria,          .



  ,

 2020




Introduction On theProductivity ofItching


Its hard to say who wins in the three thousand years game philosophy VS epidemics. Epimenides, according toDiogenes, saved Athens from pestilence. Marcus Aurelius in the midst of theAntonine plague wrote Treatise toHimself, perhaps one of the main works of the late Stoicism. Thomas Hobbes survived two or even three epidemics, but, was accused of blasphemy, which, according toParliament, caused the plague and theGreat Fire ofLondon in1666. Because of it he fell victim to the royal ban on philosophizing, and until the end of his life was engaged only in mathematics and translations. Immanuel Kant escaped at least three flu epidemics, practicing celibacy and strict daily routines. Hegel died of cholera. Kierkegaard  from tuberculosis, possibly exacerbated by the flu. Max Weber, possibly from aSpanish flu.

In case ofCOVID-19 pandemic we can say that philosophy probably wins this one, albeit not with a crushing score. Shakira, sitting on self-isolation, studied Plato and graduated from a four-week course of classical Greek philosophy at theUniversity ofPennsylvania. Slavoj Zizek on self-isolation wrote so many op-eds on the pandemic that it was enough to manage the book.

For humanitarian knowledge, this pandemic means the same as the1991Gulf War meant for the media. That was the first live war that had been televising and happening at once. This is the first pandemic, reflected by philosophers and social theorists live, here and now, in an innumerable accessible form. Columns, articles, op-eds, blog posts  if there is feast during the plague, during this we managed to look at the feast of the spirit.

However, the founders ofMoscow Philosophical Circle werent able to calmly enjoy the accessibility of the fruits of enlightenment and the steady flow of first-class humanitarian texts. Pillars of theEnglish-, French-, German-, Italian-, Hispanic-language humanitarian scenes, did not tear themselves away from desks to produce texts on coronavirus. TheRussian language as a tool of thought, having fallen into quarantine, flourished anywhere: in the heated debates of faculties atZoom, in dialogs on YouTube and fleeting skirmishes on Facebook. But didnt want to lie down on paper. Iconic figures of modern philosophy seemed to us as if asking: what did you write during the quarantine, besides fifty Facebook comments and three posts? Perhaps it was a conscience. Rather, it was the very itch that Socrates describes inPlatos Philebus.

The book you are holding is the product of this itch. It is unique for several reasons.

First, it gives a panoramic picture of the phenomenon that mankind encountered in the first half of2020. In terms of the coverage of the plots given to us by the pandemic for observation and evaluation. In terms of the scatter of points of view. And in terms of the focus and sharpness of the advanced estimates and proposed arguments.

Second, it is a multi-party book. If we can call SARS-CoV-2 a thing, then this is its full-fledged democratic parliament. TheRussian intellectual space has long been marked by demarcation lines protecting the integrity and hermeticity of intellectual camps. Goodbye COVID? behaves as if these lines do not exist. Left, right, liberal, communist, statist, and anarchist points of view and argumentation systems are presented here on an equal footing. And no, neither the world nor this book collapsed from an unexpected or even provocative neighborhood. On the contrary, they became more voluminous and enlightened.

Thirdly, as it seems to us, this book is a good example of how should work a conscious attitude toward those forms of inequality that have no place in science and academia. We are talking about gender, ranks, and merits, about the age and differences in academic statuses. Absolute equality is still only a mathematical function, but we tried to get to it as close as was possible.

The collection consists of four sections. Choosing names for them we could not resist the temptation to play a game with the nomen of the virus that hit the world  SARS. To emphasize the inconceivable expressiveness ofCOVID-19, we used words ofEsperanto, not live, not dead, not purely artificial, but not a natural language, the justification for the existence of which could confuse anyone, as well as the justification for the existence of a virus that is too perfect, to be a pure offspring of nature.

TheScio (Knowledge) section contains texts examining the problem of collision with COVID-19 through the prism of epistemology and speculative philosophy. Autonomeco (Autonomy) section presents this clash in the optics of personal ontological, existential and ethical experience. Reagoj (Reactions) combines texts that interpret in one way or another the reactive nature of this collision, which mixes and redefines the set of maps, ideas, and situations in which weve been caught before the pandemic. Societo (Society) section collects texts devoted to social structures (in a broad sense of the word) that have been manifested, actualized, affected, or destroyed by a pandemic.

The usual words of gratitude to the authors and those who helped the birth of this book are not enough. Our idea to gather thepandemic series of texts together under one cover received approval and support from everyone we contacted from the very first attempt. The authors  philosophers, political scientists, sociologists, anthropologists  agreed on very short notice to participate. Foreign colleagues helped with all the difficulties that arise. Expert Institution ofSocial Researches, Moscow-based think tank, despite the obvious adventurousness of the idea (a book? aphilosophical book? in two months? it cant happen!), provided the necessary funding. Colleagues from the editorial office of theLogos journal and theGaidar Institute Press, without asking any questions, gave us a comradely shoulder in advance and immediately agreed to be publishers. From the moment of the birth of this crazy idea to the appearance of the book layout, less than a month and a half passed, so it was truly a miracle, by any standards.

The world will never be the same this seems to be the main post-COVID mantra. We do not quite agree with this. There is another world, and it exists regardless of epidemics and crises. This other world is called respublica literaria, and you are now holding the artifact from it.



Moscow Philosophical Circle,

June 2020




Scio





      ?

     

 



 .    ,   -  ; ,  ;

e-mail: kralechkin@gmail.com (mailto:%20kralechkin@gmail.com)



     ,    XIX      ,         .       ,        ,       ,     .          ,      .



 : ,  , ,  

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_1




What Can We Know andWhat May We Hope for?

TheEpistemic Condition of aPandemic

Dmitriy Kralechkin


Independent scholar and translator, contributing editor of philosophical literary journal Logos; Moscow, Russian Federation;

e-mail: kralechkin@gmail.com (mailto:%20kralechkin@gmail.com)



The article analyses the general setting of medical knowledge, which includes and privileges the individual patients position. In a pandemic, this setting suffers from overstretching that produces drastic changes, shifting the equilibrium that has been achieved by emphasizing an individual private observer, eliminating anomalies and generalizing knowledge. The pandemic threatens to overturn this fragile equilibrium, but, at the same time, may sketch a new epistemic assemblage.



Keywords: pandemic, epistemic condition, Canguilhem, private patient

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_1




* * *

     ? 蠫 ?       ?,              ,  ,      .




    : , , 


   ,      ,         .        ,    ,   ,      ,        .         ,      ,     . ,      ,   ,                .   ,    ,    ,  ?      - ,    - ,           ?                    ?

 ,        ꠫   ,     ,        ,       ,   ,    . ,  , -,  ,             ,         .       ,    -  .      ,   ,       ,            .               ,     ,  ,   .

                .    ,   ,         , .         ,       .     ꠫   ,           ,      :             ,   ,  ,            ,      .

  ,    ,      ,   .            ,    ,          , .        ,     ,   ,    -     ,     ,           (        ),       ,       ,   ,          , , ,       ,     , , ,        .  ,            :     -   ,     -,   ,         ,     ,   ,         ,    ,         -   ?               :      ,    ?

        ,        ,         . ,    ,     ,       ?         ,       ,       - ,   , ,      ,   ,  ,   ,       ,     .  ,    ,   ,       ,    ,    ,    ,       ,     , ,  ,      : ,     ,    ,               ,          .

,       ,    ,           .      ,          (   ,   ),    ,        ,              ,   ,      ,    ,         ,            ,       .        :     ,                  ,        ,  ,  ,             ?  ,                        -,  , , ,  ,  ?

     ,    .   ,     ,   (   ),  , , ,         ,           ,      . , ,  ,       ,     ,  , ,       -.            蠫 ,   ,      ,      ,    ,  ,  ,  ..[1 - , 2016      ,     ,        ,        (Ydelannoy. Electrosensibilit: plus rapide que la science, la justice va-t-elle trop vite?// Mediapart. 16.11.2016; https://blogs.mediapart.fr/ydelannoy/blog/161216/electrosensibilite-plus-rapide-que-la-science-la-justice-va-t-elle-trop-vite (https://blogs.mediapart.fr/ydelannoy/blog/161216/electrosensibilite-plus-rapide-que-la-science-la-justice-va-t-elle-trop-vite)).   ,             (2015).  ,   ,       ,         (.,: Specter M. TheLyme Wars// TheNew Yorker. July 1, 2013. Issue; https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/07/01/the-lyme-wars (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/07/01/the-lyme-wars)).]

      ,    ( )   ,       .  ,    (     )         . ,       ,         ,              .  ,       ,         ,  ,          .        ,  ,     ,        (     ).     de iure  , ,     .




    :      


          ,   ,        -,    ,        ,     ,       ,  ,   ..

       ,       .      ,   ,           . ,  XVIIIXIX          ,   , ,   ,      ,        [2 - Canguilhem G. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires deFrance, Quadrige, 1966.] (   ).          ,       STS.      ,               ,     .   XIX     ,            (         ).

        :      , ,     ?        ,       ,  ,        ?          ,         ?           , ,         ?

        , ,         , , ,         ,     .  ,        ,     ,   ,    ,   :     . ,    ,    ,      - ,     .       ,      .            ,   ,   ,       ,          ,     .

      ,       , ,    ,        ,    . ,  ,    ,   ,          . ,   empowerment, ,       ,        ,     , ,      .      , ,   - (          ),       ,        ,       .  ,        .                       , ,   ,          ,  ,     .

 ,        ,         ,        ,    ,           .     ,    ,    ,  ,        ,    ,        .        - , ,    . , ,          ,  ,      .

,         ,    ,   ,    ; ,        ,  ,             (  )   .    ,    ,       ,       ,    ,     ,       ,     .  -  ,              , ,    ,          .   ,    ,       (            ),        .

 ,      ,   ,    ,       .  -    ,     ,      - ,    .  ,                ,   ,     -, ,    ,       ,    .     ,  -   .




:  


      /      ,    , ,              .         ,      ,   , ,       ,    , , ,      , ..

 ,  ,   ,       .      COVID-19        - (  ,            ),         .        ,  ,          ,       .             ,   ; ,  ,      (  ,    ).                  ,     ,       ,      (      ).

    ,   ,     ,    ,      .     -      ,     ,         .        ,        ,           ,         .             , ,    ,   .            ,         ,       , ,  ,  ,        ,   .     - ,  (  )      ,          ,        ,     . , ,  ,        ,         ,        .

            ,       .     ,    ,            ,    ,     ,     ,   .            .   (   ,        )      : COVID-19     ,     ,       .  ,                  ,      /   (  /  ),        ,   ,     .

   - ,     ,        (, ,  ..) 䠫  ,   ,   . , ,   ,          ,       ,    ,            (    , ,   ).           ,         ,      .      ,      ,      , ,       ,     ,         .        ,   ,    , .                  .

,           ,      ANT   ,[3 -  .   :        - // . 2018. . 28. 5. . 5384.]   ,      ,    , ,   [4 - ., : Timmer J. Do face masks help? Studies leaning toward yes// Arstechnica. 05.06.2020; https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/do-face-masks-help-studies-leaning-towards-yes/ (https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/do-face-masks-help-studies-leaning-towards-yes/).]. ,  ,            ,          ,    .       , ,    ,     ,      ,   ,     ,     ,                . ,           (     ), ,       ,         ,      ,     .          ,      ,   .

 ,   ,                ,    ,  . ,  , ,      ,         -.   . [5 -  .   //   . 05.06.2020; https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/meditsina-kak-religija (https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/meditsina-kak-religija).],   ,     , , ,      ,         ,     ,       ,    . ,   ,             .      ,       ,           ,   ,             :  ,    ,         ,     .

           [6 - Pascariello P. Chloroquine: pourquoi le pass deDidier Raoult joue contre lui// Mediapart. 07.04.2020; https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/070420/chloroquine-pourquoi-le-passe-de-didier-raoult-joue-contre-lui (https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/070420/chloroquine-pourquoi-le-passe-de-didier-raoult-joue-contre-lui).],    .  ,  ,         ,      . ,            ,       -,   -. ,         ,          ,      ,   ,   ,  ,   .  ,             ,           ,       ,      .

,          ,       -,   ,          .   ,      ,     ,  ,        ,           ,  SIR (Susceptible, Infected, Resistant).    ,   ,    ,       ,    , ,    ,    -.

,             (     ,      ),          ,       ,        . ,  蠫        ,        ,     , , ,         : ,         (       ),      in vitro,     堫  ,    ,   .     ,    ,   ,    ,    ,         ,      .

        (     ),        ,   ,     ,    (  )      (    ).   ,   ,               ,        . -    ,        ( ),                 (overdiagnosis).          ,      ,   ,          (       ),       ,       ,        ,   ,    ,       .

 ,   (      ,      )     ,  ,    ,           ,   :              (  ,    ,         ),        ,  ,         , ,      ,       .    ,      ,       , ,        ,   .    ,            ,     (    ),  ,   ,          ,       ,    ,      .   ,          (  ,     ),     ,            .

  ,     ,     蠫,       , ,  ..   ,    ,      ,      .    蠫    ,    COVID-19        ,     (         ), , , ,           [7 - Kahn H. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960; Idem. Thinking about the unthinkable. New York: Horizon Press, 1962.],     :    ,  ,   ,     ,         .           -  ,      ,     ,      ;  ,            ,      .           (,     , ,     ),             蠫 ,    . , ,            .

       ,        ,        :  ,    .     .  ,     ,  ,  ,     ,       ,    ,      .

              ,       ,   , , ,       ,         .      :        (       ),   (      ), ,       ,       .       ,    -,  ,  -,          ,         .




   

 



 .  ,  ,  ; Universit deLausanne, CH-1015Lausanne, Switzerland;

e-mail: mmaiatsky@gmail.com (mailto:%20mmaiatsky@gmail.com)



          .         ,          .          ,       , , ,  .              ,   ,       .  ,   ,    ,        ,         . ,  digital native   covid native,  ,        ,    .   (precautionary principle)    .



 : , digital native, covid native,  

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_2




Between Panic andHope

Michail Maiatsky


Michail Maiatsky. Fellow, Facult desLettres; Universit deLausanne, CH-1015Lausanne, Switzerland;

e-mail: mmaiatsky@gmail.com (mailto:%20mmaiatsky@gmail.com)



The author notices the actual pandemia fits into a continuity of various (petrol, financial, economic) crises. Philosophers, too, expected TheEvent (cf. Heideggers Ereignis, Deleuzes vnement) celebrating the unforeseen, the unexpected, non causal. The fear is here mixed with a chiliastic hope for salvation brought by this ultimate event. Both fear and hope are recognizable in the reaction to the current covid crisis. The latter showed, amongst others, that the state is still present and powerful, and is able to stop and modify production process. The state bears its responsibility for managing big crises like this.



Keywords: covid crisis, digital native, covid native, precautionary principle

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_2




* * *



:  , , .   ,     .       ,  . []

:  ,   ,  .       .

 . 

    ,   ?      ,    ,    , ?    -  ,      ?

   ,     .      蠫  , ,  ,  , ,    ,            , -  ,    ,  .    ,     ,         .

      , , ,       ( -   ,        )            ;          . -      ⠫ : , 2012     (  - )    ,       [8 - Mayer J.-F. Le phnom?ne 2012: entre attentes apocalyptiques etNouvel ?ge; Strub, M., Roulet, A. Lanne 2012 ?quoi invite-t-elle? Collection de quelques rflexions et voix mayas sur le calendrier maya et lanne 2012.   : Bornet Ph. et al. (ed.) La fin du monde. Analyses plurielles dun motif religieux, scientifique et culturel. Gen?ve: Labor etFides, 2012.].

    (   -,    ; .   )      (, , , , ),    :    - ,     .     (- ?      ?) ,   ,    -   ,    ?      (,   ,    )  ,   ,  (    ??????),              ,              : ,  (, ,      򻠖     ),  ( ),  (    ),       (9/11,   )    ⠫  (. , . ).          .      ,    .             ,  ,     .

       ( )   :   (     ?)        ?    ,      !      .               .     (the only Soviet Marxist to be taken seriously,  )      ,    ,      ,  , , -  ,  ,       ,       ,       ,   ,     ?

            :    ,     ,   ,   ,   ,   , ,   .       ?   ( , sive Natura)    ?     ?

    .  ,    ,  (      1930- ,     )  (Ereignis),       , ,  .    (1969)        ,   ,  ,    :  (lvnement)  砫 ,      ;      , .     , ,     .   -   Ereignis,   - ,   ,   ,         .                    -         .          , revolutio,       .       ,                      .       ,             ,    ,       .

       ,     ,     ,    . ,   ,     ,     


,     ,     .             .        ;  ,  ,     蠫,      . ,   -  -    ,     ,  .       ,       ,         ,  ,  .     ,      ,    :           [9 - Oliver-Smith A. What is aDisaster: Anthropological Perspectives on aPersistent Question// Hoffmann S., Oliver-Smith A. (ed.). TheAngry Earth. Disaster inAnthropological Perspective. London: Routledge, 1999. P. 1834 (: . 2829).].       ,     ,   .         .         ,   .  , ,      .         , ,      ,        . ,    ,     (  񻠖   ,  ).     ,                ,                .

   ,       (, ,        -). ,  ,      [10 - Michaels D. Doubt is their product: how industrys assault on science threatens your health. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.].     (     )      :   ,   ,   .  !  :  ; , ,  :   .  -      ,     ,   (!) .

     :         . ,         .    .    - ,   ,  .       ,     .     -     .       ()     ()   .

    ,  -.     , ,  .   ,    ( )?        .     ,   ,    ,         .       (Heuristik der Furcht)[11 - Jonas H. DasPrinzip Verantwortung. Fr.a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1979. S. 64.].      ,   ,  .  ,      , , ,  : , ,  ,      ,    ,     non-state actors,      .              ,    ,  ,      ,   ,      . ,           ?          (, . IPCC)           . ,  ,       ,  -     ,  .     ,        .  ,   ࠫ,         .

    ,  ,        .     ,         .   .  ,     (,       -,       ),    ,    ,              .  ,    ,       .     ,         ,   .   ,        ,       .  ,           ,       : , ,   ,  . ,    2020,       ,   ,     , ,  ,  ? ,             -whistleblower,           ,        .

      ,  蠫    ,     .     ,      .   ? ( , ,    ),     ;       : ,  . ,       ,        .    [12 -    -  OuLiPo  ˸.]   .  ,    ,      [13 - Bayard Pierre. Le Titanic fera naufrage. Paris: Minuit, 2016.]  ,     -     .       :  - (          ,      )     (           ).    ,         ,            ,        ,   .

  ,      ,        ,       ,   .       ,      ,   , ,    .              .         .  , , -   ,      . ,          ,     ,     ,        , 젫 ,  ,    .     ,  ,  .    ,        :   ,                .         (     ),   .    ,    ,    ࠫ ,   .             statements,       .  , ,         , ,  ,     , ,      .  ,     .

,            ,    ,   ,      .    ,    ,    . , ,        ,      ;        ,        (  ) , .             ,   -  ,   .   ,  ,    .         :  , , ,  , ,  .      ,     ,   -  .      ,        ,  , , ,    Angst (, ,  conditio humana)    Furcht     ,          .               (.    ),   ,     . , ,            ,       .

,  ,    .   ,        ,             .   ,     ,         .       (,  , )         .       -    .           ,      , ,            , , ,   (   -).       (   ,   ),   ,       .  ,   ,    ,         ,         . ,  digital native   covid native,  ,        ,    .   (precautionary principle)    .

 , ?   ,   , , ,      .




, , 

 



 .        -;  , 191187, -, . , 6/1;

e-mail: yregev@eu.spb.ru (mailto:%20yregev@eu.spb.ru)



    :  .           ,             ,         .      ,          COVID-19,           .              ,         .



 : , , -,  

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_3




Peter, Lenin, COVID

Yoel Regev


Yoel Regev. Associate Professor, Stasis Center forPractical Philosophy, European University atSt Petersburg, Department ofSociology andPhilosophy; 6/1A, GagarinskayaSt., St Petersburg, 191187, Russia;

e-mail: yregev@eu.spb.ru (mailto:%20yregev@eu.spb.ru)



The paper deals with a special kind of temporality, that ofpast-non-determined. Contrary to the common-sense position, based on the metaphysics of presence, this temporality is provided here an ontological, and not only subjective, status. While being characterizing each beginning disease, it is especially important for understanding of the current situation ofCOVID-19 a new disease spreading all over the world. This situation is further determined as proclaiming the arrival of a new kind of modernity, which is based on algorithms of cutting the temporal rows and changing the past.



Keywords: ontology, temporality, TJ-ing, touching typology

DOI: 10.22394/978-5-93255-592-7_3




* * *



           . ,    .

     ?  .

 , ,   .

 ,  .   




1


        ,    . , ,          ,           ,   .           ,       .

          .     ,      ,     .        ,      ,   .  :     ,  ,      .   ,      .             .            . ,   ,    ,  ,   ,  ,     蠫  ,     ,    , .               蠫 .




  .


   .

   ,     (https://www.litres.ru/pages/biblio_book/?art=63410223)  .

      Visa, MasterCard, Maestro,    ,   ,     ,  PayPal, WebMoney, ., QIWI ,       .



notes








1


, 2016      ,     ,        ,        (Ydelannoy. Electrosensibilit: plus rapide que la science, la justice va-t-elle trop vite?// Mediapart. 16.11.2016; https://blogs.mediapart.fr/ydelannoy/blog/161216/electrosensibilite-plus-rapide-que-la-science-la-justice-va-t-elle-trop-vite (https://blogs.mediapart.fr/ydelannoy/blog/161216/electrosensibilite-plus-rapide-que-la-science-la-justice-va-t-elle-trop-vite)).   ,             (2015).  ,   ,       ,         (.,: Specter M. TheLyme Wars// TheNew Yorker. July 1, 2013. Issue; https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/07/01/the-lyme-wars (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/07/01/the-lyme-wars)).




2


Canguilhem G. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires deFrance, Quadrige, 1966.




3


 .   :        - // . 2018. . 28. 5. . 5384.




4


., : Timmer J. Do face masks help? Studies leaning toward yes// Arstechnica. 05.06.2020; https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/do-face-masks-help-studies-leaning-towards-yes/ (https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/06/do-face-masks-help-studies-leaning-towards-yes/).




5


 .   //   . 05.06.2020; https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/meditsina-kak-religija (https://centerforpoliticsanalysis.ru/position/read/id/meditsina-kak-religija).




6


Pascariello P. Chloroquine: pourquoi le pass deDidier Raoult joue contre lui// Mediapart. 07.04.2020; https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/070420/chloroquine-pourquoi-le-passe-de-didier-raoult-joue-contre-lui (https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/070420/chloroquine-pourquoi-le-passe-de-didier-raoult-joue-contre-lui).




7


Kahn H. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960; Idem. Thinking about the unthinkable. New York: Horizon Press, 1962.




8


Mayer J.-F. Le phnom?ne 2012: entre attentes apocalyptiques etNouvel ?ge; Strub, M., Roulet, A. Lanne 2012 ?quoi invite-t-elle? Collection de quelques rflexions et voix mayas sur le calendrier maya et lanne 2012.   : Bornet Ph. et al. (ed.) La fin du monde. Analyses plurielles dun motif religieux, scientifique et culturel. Gen?ve: Labor etFides, 2012.




9


Oliver-Smith A. What is aDisaster: Anthropological Perspectives on aPersistent Question// Hoffmann S., Oliver-Smith A. (ed.). TheAngry Earth. Disaster inAnthropological Perspective. London: Routledge, 1999. P. 1834 (: . 2829).




10


Michaels D. Doubt is their product: how industrys assault on science threatens your health. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.




11


Jonas H. DasPrinzip Verantwortung. Fr.a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1979. S. 64.




12


   -  OuLiPo  ˸.




13


Bayard Pierre. Le Titanic fera naufrage. Paris: Minuit, 2016.


